Replies

  • 9801265862?profile=original

  • 9801267864?profile=original

    MOTM

  • Up the fucking aussies

  • Clinical in both semi and final. Starc was complete dogshit. Never seen an Aussie bowler smashed like that in a 20/20 game.

    • Starc was very unlucky. In his second over he Should of have Williams but hazelwood dropped it for a four. Next couple ball of the over Williamson smashed him. In his third over Williamson edged the first two balls both for fours over short third man. Could of easily gone to the fielder and prevented more smashing that over. Every team rides their luck for example M Marsh hit the balls just short of fielders a couple of times whereas Williamson got dropped and edges a few away. It's the nature of t20. Sometimes it's not ur day.

      • Yeah true, but an experienced bowler such as himself shouldn't have lost his rag bowling either too full or short. Williamson read him like a monk does the bible. Starc didn't have any plan in his bowling whatsoever. Anyway, he's been out of form for 2-3 years now. I'd rather have Richardson in his place.

        • Fair criticism. Starc is very reliant on his yorker. Needs to find some more variation in the death. Look at the way Cummins bowled in the last 2 matches with his into the wicket variations. However, remember that in the past 2 ODI world cups Starc was the leading wicket taker. His test cricket may of been poor against India last summer but few players would be even able to come onto a field if their father past away. Hope Starc rediscovers his mojo this summer and destroys England and the barmy army 

        • That's the risk with Mitch. He's not Hazlewood or Cummins, he's an out and out strike bowler. On another day he could've gotten 3 or 4. 

  • Gee they did it in a canter. At least Mitch Starc was there to make a game of it.

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Lol imagine how Wallaby fans feel. 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Roy tannous replied to Angry Eel's discussion Hypothetical Question
"If you add prime fui fui and Hindy.cause even with prime Hayne and semi.our fowards would just be a letdown "
1 hour ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"He is worth a million to a club without a good kicking game. But that's not us."
1 hour ago
Joel K replied to Angry Eel's discussion Hypothetical Question
"it won't be enough, their yardage won't help our slow ruck in the middle"
2 hours ago
Angry Eel replied to Angry Eel's discussion Hypothetical Question
"You don't think the yardage of Hayne and Semi would lay a better platform for our forwards?"
2 hours ago
Joel K replied to Angry Eel's discussion Hypothetical Question
"Nope, our forwards are nowhere near good enough 
let's say you add them + Hindy and Fuifui then yes I think we would be a threat"
2 hours ago
Angry Eel replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"My good mail is we were both at 1m and St George came through with the 5th year which was always his priority to get security with this contract"
3 hours ago
Angry Eel replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"MON has done an ok job but he's a middle of the road GM. We have the resources we need to recruit THE BEST if we want to break this drought end of story. "
3 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"I just don't want Ryles to be the fuse, because as much as I wanted ba out, those above washed their hands with him, and made him totally accountable for the demise of the entire club and thats all im going to say about this subject for a while…"
3 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"I dunno about MoN being " the number 1 issue with the club atm" but he can be used as a pressure valve...or a fuse if you like...something necessary but replaceable that blows when things get too hot so as to protect the actual important things.…"
4 hours ago
Joel K replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"I did hear that podcast HOE, it was on BTFU. He did say 1.2m over 5 years but didn't specify any TPAs"
4 hours ago
Angry Eel replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"It would be competitive but would it get the deal done. Whilst I admit on the surface 950-1m appears overs I'd pay that to get the deal done. It's not overs when it's exactly what you team needs to make a massive improvement to your squad"
4 hours ago
Angry Eel replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Poppa I'm a fan of a Burton signing. What im saying is I don't think we are blocking Lorenzo's path if we are paying Burton right. I don't think centre would be an issue for Burton if Lorenzo becomes a must pick at some stage. He doesn't strike me…"
4 hours ago
Richard Jackson replied to Richard Jackson's discussion Remember Rodney Hogg
"Thanks Darren, when Journos asked him for comment he always looked agrieved and sought to end the discussion.
Did you know his sullen appearance belied the fact he was quite smart, matriculating in pure and applied Maths, physics and economics.
He…"
5 hours ago
Poppa replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"I think you guys have a problem with Renzo as our 5/8. He is not the type of 5/8 Parra needs, unless he can defend to a certain level it will not matter how "brilliant" he is. These brilliant young players look fantastic in Reserve Grade but the…"
5 hours ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"surely 850k for 4 years would be competetive, starting in 27"
6 hours ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"longfin what do you mean best years are behind him at 26"
6 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>