Here is a sexual orientation test that will be very helpful to those who have always been a bit unsure on 1EE, a blog about breaking down the barriers of sexual bigotry and oppression..

Nothing wrong with being unsure either, the world takes all sorts and this blog is not intended to mock any one group as all groups are equal, its a simple test.

If we all understand each others sexuality a bit better it opens the doors for better relationships, we can all get on better!

https://www.idrlabs.com/sexual-orientation/test.php

How did you go? This test has scientific backing for what its worth, results are factual.

Heres mine

3816915151?profile=RESIZE_710x

I do have access to some peoples test results that i will be releasing if they choose not to make their results public.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • What does that even mean sluggy?

      • This reply was deleted.
        • Slugg, You have to do the test in an upright position. 

        • Do the test while aroused Sluggy, check if your results are the same.

  • Snake, Pretty boring results for me. Stock standard : raging 100% heterosexual. Plus, happily married to a pretty extraordinary woman. We play a few role-playing games, but no outrageous fantasies. No complaints at all.

     

     

     

    • Oooh! role playing games! you legend! i love that stuff.

    • lol - boggle?

      HoE - do any of these games involve a teddy bear or some other form of stuffed animal?

      2882778449?profile=RESIZE_710x

      • Haha, Krams. Not lately, lol.

        I reckon they look like a Helga & George.

         

  • I didn't have time to read al the questions, so I just copied Patsy's answers;

    3817014721?profile=RESIZE_710x

    • Haha thats exactly the same as Supers.

      • Actually that would be Supers brother

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Joel K replied to Angry Eel's discussion Hypothetical Question
"it won't be enough, their yardage won't help our slow ruck in the middle"
38 minutes ago
Angry Eel replied to Angry Eel's discussion Hypothetical Question
"You don't think the yardage of Hayne and Semi would lay a better platform for our forwards?"
54 minutes ago
Joel K replied to Angry Eel's discussion Hypothetical Question
"Nope, our forwards are nowhere near good enough 
let's say you add them + Hindy and Fuifui then yes I think we would be a threat"
56 minutes ago
Angry Eel replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"My good mail is we were both at 1m and St George came through with the 5th year which was always his priority to get security with this contract"
1 hour ago
Angry Eel replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"MON has done an ok job but he's a middle of the road GM. We have the resources we need to recruit THE BEST if we want to break this drought end of story. "
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"I just don't want Ryles to be the fuse, because as much as I wanted ba out, those above washed their hands with him, and made him totally accountable for the demise of the entire club and thats all im going to say about this subject for a while…"
2 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"I dunno about MoN being " the number 1 issue with the club atm" but he can be used as a pressure valve...or a fuse if you like...something necessary but replaceable that blows when things get too hot so as to protect the actual important things.…"
2 hours ago
Joel K replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"I did hear that podcast HOE, it was on BTFU. He did say 1.2m over 5 years but didn't specify any TPAs"
2 hours ago
Angry Eel replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"It would be competitive but would it get the deal done. Whilst I admit on the surface 950-1m appears overs I'd pay that to get the deal done. It's not overs when it's exactly what you team needs to make a massive improvement to your squad"
2 hours ago
Angry Eel replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Poppa I'm a fan of a Burton signing. What im saying is I don't think we are blocking Lorenzo's path if we are paying Burton right. I don't think centre would be an issue for Burton if Lorenzo becomes a must pick at some stage. He doesn't strike me…"
3 hours ago
Richard Jackson replied to Richard Jackson's discussion Remember Rodney Hogg
"Thanks Darren, when Journos asked him for comment he always looked agrieved and sought to end the discussion.
Did you know his sullen appearance belied the fact he was quite smart, matriculating in pure and applied Maths, physics and economics.
He…"
3 hours ago
Poppa replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"I think you guys have a problem with Renzo as our 5/8. He is not the type of 5/8 Parra needs, unless he can defend to a certain level it will not matter how "brilliant" he is. These brilliant young players look fantastic in Reserve Grade but the…"
3 hours ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"surely 850k for 4 years would be competetive, starting in 27"
4 hours ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"longfin what do you mean best years are behind him at 26"
4 hours ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"100% chief there's only 1 way to see if lorenzo is up to it"
4 hours ago
Hector Bob Down replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"Chiefy Chiefy where have i ever said we shouldn't sack either of the two YOU continually referr to on every blog that comes up . Im beginning to think one or both must have put the hard word on Mrs Chiefy or something . Most of us probably agree…"
4 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>