Here is a sexual orientation test that will be very helpful to those who have always been a bit unsure on 1EE, a blog about breaking down the barriers of sexual bigotry and oppression..

Nothing wrong with being unsure either, the world takes all sorts and this blog is not intended to mock any one group as all groups are equal, its a simple test.

If we all understand each others sexuality a bit better it opens the doors for better relationships, we can all get on better!

https://www.idrlabs.com/sexual-orientation/test.php

How did you go? This test has scientific backing for what its worth, results are factual.

Heres mine

3816915151?profile=RESIZE_710x

I do have access to some peoples test results that i will be releasing if they choose not to make their results public.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • What does that even mean sluggy?

      • This reply was deleted.
        • Slugg, You have to do the test in an upright position. 

        • Do the test while aroused Sluggy, check if your results are the same.

  • Snake, Pretty boring results for me. Stock standard : raging 100% heterosexual. Plus, happily married to a pretty extraordinary woman. We play a few role-playing games, but no outrageous fantasies. No complaints at all.

     

     

     

    • Oooh! role playing games! you legend! i love that stuff.

    • lol - boggle?

      HoE - do any of these games involve a teddy bear or some other form of stuffed animal?

      2882778449?profile=RESIZE_710x

      • Haha, Krams. Not lately, lol.

        I reckon they look like a Helga & George.

         

  • I didn't have time to read al the questions, so I just copied Patsy's answers;

    3817014721?profile=RESIZE_710x

    • Haha thats exactly the same as Supers.

      • Actually that would be Supers brother

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Perpetual Motion replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 Delayed Until 2028: Good News
"The brightside is that we are not Tigpies fans that havent even played finals since 2011."
36 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 Delayed Until 2028: Good News
"Welcome to the Nursing Home Randolph....Only genius's allowed!"
37 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 Delayed Until 2028: Good News
""
45 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 Delayed Until 2028: Good News
"Yeah, you're right. PM...and there is a chance (moses foot anyone?) that it works out really well for us...but we are a damaged fan base and we expect the worst...that someone or everyone fucked up...and while we wait for the worst to occur, as it…"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 Delayed Until 2028: Good News
"But this is the thing the club created this with the options when your talking a club that doesn't develop and leaves an avenue open for another club to take our best for me is an issue.
Your right he could have chose to stay but let's be real here…"
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 Delayed Until 2028: Good News
"genius"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 Delayed Until 2028: Good News
"No, nor do I think there will be. Same with Paps and Melbourne."
1 hour ago
shane replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 Delayed Until 2028: Good News
"poppa we all want a better side but you can not rely on those who drop you as quick as Lomax, he is a winger which can be replace, no one is not replaceable, good players come and go and younger 1's take their place and become the good players. All…"
1 hour ago
Perpetual Motion replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 Delayed Until 2028: Good News
"And we complained about that fact for weeks. But its done."
1 hour ago
Cumberland Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 Delayed Until 2028: Good News
"Is there any news on whether Lomax might return to Parra now given what's happening in R360? "
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 Delayed Until 2028: Good News
"How exactly does he help us going foward exactly?
All this tells me since they knee capped themselves with the DB deal and the options opening the door they had no plan b behind this is the issue.
You can arse lick this front office all you like I'm…"
2 hours ago
Adam Magrath replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 Delayed Until 2028: Good News
"At some point Coryn you are going to have to move on from the Dylan Brown situation. I'm not sure why you keep referencing it. You seem to ignore the fact that Dylan could have chosen to stay with us, but he chose to leave (same with Zac)."
2 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 Delayed Until 2028: Good News
"I see so he is defending you in this occasion? If so my response is done accordingly."
3 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 Delayed Until 2028: Good News
"Parra First doesn't mean Parra Stupid. Ryles believes Pezet helps. Since when is a bridge or halves depth dumb? If we don't want to help player development for others, don't sign anyone, don't have juniors. Because plenty will end up elsewhere.
 "
4 hours ago
Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 Delayed Until 2028: Good News
"Smart bosses don't let that happen. 
Politis was in a position of saying he would not deal with Tedesco's manager, convenience worked out and it was completed through a third party.....do you think Politis felt like a fool or could give a stuff.
A…"
4 hours ago
Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion R360 Delayed Until 2028: Good News
"shane  I don't think there is any question of him being guilty of something..... proving he left for 360 is now totally irrelevant.
Do you want a better side or not and whether he wants to continue with Parra and the reason/rationale is the only…"
4 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>