Will we lose points

With all the talk of the aleged up coming points loss I find it funny that there hasn't been a suspension of betting on the eels to win the premiership, is it just me or is that a sign we won't lose points, considering betting is a big part of the game these days surely the NRL has an obligation to notify the betting agencies if such penalties were going to applied

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • While I am a little surprised that betting hasn't been suspended, the fact it hasn't has nothing to do with whatever penalty is getting handed down, even in the case of the Dogs and Storm I beleive betting wasn't suspended until the league announced it was ready to hand down the penalty

    one thing I do find interesting is I haven't seen a wooden spoon market this year instead it has been a "most losses" market, I think this could be due to the Eels salary cap and the Dogs and Storm when a couple of people in the know put bets on those teams winning the spoon before betting was suspended

  • The bookies are happy to take money on us to win the competition, if we lose points all the punters lose their money...
  • ok so I was right that it may have been done in relation to the Dogs and Storm cap issues

  • As it currently stand we're not over the cap this season. If we won premierships back 2013 2014 2015 they could strip premierships if we found to exceed the cap my 2mill each season which is probably equivalent to storm as cap was much less when storm got caught.
    • Well they can have there spoons back.
  • I can see the writing on the wall! How many points is the issue!!?? I do have a question for my fellow learned eels supporters....would they spread the points over two seasons??? Example we lose 4 points this year (2016) with 6 points suspended from 2017 on the proviso that certain board members are suspended??? Just a possible theory where parra players and supporters are not completely bent over and the NRL still keeps the power in this relationship?!?! The league are aware that they need a strong parra to promote the game in the west and to compete with the growth of the western Sydney Wanderers and now the Western Sydney Giants!
    • Theres no way they will spread deducted points over 2 seasons, that would be terrible for their product, they will want to get this out of the way this year.

  • Conversation for another day, let's just enjoy the absolute show the boys put on for us today!

    We've been waiting for our team to play like this for so long, let's just enjoy it!

    We'll cross the penalty bridge if and when it comes.
  • While a points penalty hasn't been spread over two years suspended sentences have

    In the case of the Storm, while they played for no points in 2010, they also had the threat of being kicked out of the comp for the 2011 season if they didn't shred just over $1 million from their cap by the end of 2010, which is why Hoffman and Inglis (along with lesser names) left after 2010.

    Given that the Eels issues are more board governance issues rather then a dead set rort like Melbourne's was I could see some sort of suspended points penalty if the board members the NRL blames for this fiasco are not removed by a certain date, depending the date it might be suspended for the 2017 season or at least for later in this year.

  • The cap being clean for this year is really the only hope Parra have to not get at least some sort of points penalty.

    In each of the cases (Bulldogs 2002, Warriors 2006 and Storm 2010)  the teams were over the cap in the year of the penalty as well as preceding years with the severity of the amount over the cap and the process of cheating determining the penalty.

    Not sure how it will fly in the NRL and the court of public opinion but it is a hope.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Richard Jackson replied to LB's discussion 1EE Modern day Eels team: Wingers
"Ah the 'flash' what a loyal clubman considering he was a Queenslander"
4 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Just checked the SC registry. At this point in time the hearing is listed to continue from today until Monday, 17 March."
32 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Folks, the hearing was delayed this morning with a last ditch attempt to broker a deal following 11th hour negotiations during the weekend.
Justice Francois Kunc told the court: “I always wish parties well to resolve their differences," as reported…"
54 minutes ago
adnan replied to Prof. Daz's discussion R1 vs STORM: Gilgamesh and the Beer Goddess
"dont the storm has this impecible winning ratio of round1 games"
56 minutes ago
More…