It definitely gives us better leverage. We won't need to outbid other teams. But, if Matterson wants to stay then we keep him on the same money. We then decide if Lane stays...
Lane still has another 2 years after this and I don't see any great back rowers coming soon so they could spend the money elsewhere like a centre or another edge player is heathy
He's gotta get healthy first. He has an option in his favour, if the concussion problems persist, he'll pick up his option, so he has 18 months to earn that next deal.
With Papali'i's form I think the more realistic question is will we offer Nathan Brown another contract? There's a few clubs with a ton of cap space. If someone makes a big, long term offer to NB I think he'll take it and we won't fight it.
I have no idea why Papali'i goes to the bench when Matterson is named. Surely, Lane gets demoted to the bench and Papali'i keeps his spot. For Fuck Sake. Lane was good barring two errors. This was probabaly his best match in so long and his performance was at best pushing a 8/10. PLZ BA OPEN YOUR MIND TO THIS OPTION.
"No it is relevant. You have a weaker conference, average teams get more points against much weaker teams. If you have a team with more wins but the other team gets higher seed or makes finals due to bonus wins that's not fair. They get the bonus…"
"
Having 1 conference stronger than another would matter at all. The extra points for conference wins are only available in your own conference, therefore the strength or weakness of your conference is irrelevant. The downside I see with the…"
"Ok but firstly SL clubs would get annoyed those players can't stay. Players get annoyed they get shafted for NRL players. For 3 weeks not worth the while to get hurt. Paid extra money yet the game loses money with less product as stated before.…"
"The more points is not fair as not both conferences are the same in quality. What if one conference is more difficult than the other? Plus the 3 higher ranked doesn't solve the issue of worse teams still getting in over better teams simply due to…"
Replies
I doubt it, we wont be matching big offers, i think we'll let him go.
It definitely gives us better leverage. We won't need to outbid other teams. But, if Matterson wants to stay then we keep him on the same money. We then decide if Lane stays...
They keep talking Papali'i as a middle forward. I think he's (Arthur and Papali'i) got his eye on number 13.
Lane still has another 2 years after this and I don't see any great back rowers coming soon so they could spend the money elsewhere like a centre or another edge player is heathy
Nuikore has him well and truly covered!
hes doing a fine job at centre
He's gotta get healthy first. He has an option in his favour, if the concussion problems persist, he'll pick up his option, so he has 18 months to earn that next deal.
With Papali'i's form I think the more realistic question is will we offer Nathan Brown another contract?
There's a few clubs with a ton of cap space. If someone makes a big, long term offer to NB I think he'll take it and we won't fight it.
I have no idea why Papali'i goes to the bench when Matterson is named. Surely, Lane gets demoted to the bench and Papali'i keeps his spot. For Fuck Sake. Lane was good barring two errors. This was probabaly his best match in so long and his performance was at best pushing a 8/10. PLZ BA OPEN YOUR MIND TO THIS OPTION.
Who is saying he goes to the bench? He's a must for the starting side. I think Lane will go to the bench
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next