Replies

  • Because we need a better kicker than Gutherson.

  • This has been a problem all year. We have stupid decision makers and obviously we can afford to not take 2 points each time lol
  • Because if it was 4, then we would take it
  • 100% x 2 = 2

    10% x 6 = 0.6

    we don’t seem to get it

    sure there are other factors like wearing the opposition down

    but the second penalty straight in front should have been taken

    the opposition has had a breather and got set so take the two

  • The way we defend we need to go up in 4’s or hopefully 6’s 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Mallee57 replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Trial #2 / Pre Season Challenge Week 3 Team List v Sydney Roosters
"Whose going to do the main goal kicking this year? Moses, Pezet, Russell ? Or maybe another? Pezet is very good. Moses very good, Russell ok but struggles with kicks that are closer to the sidelines. "
43 minutes ago
Nitram replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Trial #2 / Pre Season Challenge Week 3 Team List v Sydney Roosters
"Just no injuries please. I dont care if we lose. Means nothing if we rock up to Melbourne round 1 and get flogged.
Mitch should kick a few balls, make 1-2 tackles, pass the ball once or twice and then come off.
 "
1 hour ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Trial #2 / Pre Season Challenge Week 3 Team List v Sydney Roosters
"We will finish top 4"
2 hours ago
LB replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"But also when do they do it on their own? We cannot manipulate to make them great all the time for the sake of expansion. The idea is survival of the fittest."
2 hours ago
More…