Who replaces Ma'u on the bench?

With Ma'u out injured for a good while, who replaces him on the bench? But before you come up with a solution you have to confirm what his role was meant to be first. Did BA intend to use him as an impact forward, maybe in the middle? Or was he meant to provide relief for either Lane or Niukore who may struggle to play the full 80? I don't like the idea of shifting Taka back to the bench because I don't see him providing any sort of impact from there; he's just not that kind of player and bears no resemblance to Ma'u in terms of playing style. That said, removing Taka from the backline would allow us to move Fergo to the centres and bring in Sivo on the wing, which I have been gunning for since the start of preseason. Having Taka in the centres is a complete waste of space and it weakens the backline (though personally I hate the fact he's even in the top 17 to be honest).

The other option is to bring in Gower who has provided admirable service but is nonetheless past his time. At least you'll know what you'll get from him and I don't remember many occasions when he badly let us down. Are there any other options you can think of? Who do you think BA will go with?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Id like to see Ray Stone given a run and if he cant due to whatever reason then it would have to be Niukore or Gower as a last option. Just hope its not Evans. Im not a huge fan of Taka either and think his best days are past him at at times he can be a liability.

  • This reply was deleted.
    • It will require patience but Sivo could be the ultimate winger and replicate Fergo's recent form. Fergo will still be a great asset in the centres which is an area that needs urgent attention.

       

      • Why not have Fergo on one side and Sivo on the other?

  • How long he out for?

    At his age,he is injury prone.

    • Ma'u is likely to be out for a good 5 weeks from rd1.

       

  • Im not convinced Mau was destined to come off the bench to begin with. He has started in most of his appearances under BA and still has the ability to play big minutes.

    Leaving that to one side, if we assume a back rower now comes onto the bench that otherwise might not make the 17 - I think the answer is Taka. 

     

    • I think Niukore has surpassed Manu. He'll be our starting edge forward on a permanent basis from now on I'd say.

       

  • You guys are overthinking what BA will do. It will be the same squad from the last trial with Paulo coming in for Manu. Tepai most likely move to the bench and alternate between front and 2nd row.

  • Round 1 side 

     

    1: C Gutherson ( c )

    2: B Ferguson 

    3: M Jennings

    4: G Jennings 

    5: M Sivo

    6: D Brown

    7: M Moses

    8: Jr Paulo

    9: R Mahoney

    10: D Alvaro

    11: M Nuikore 

    12: S Lane

    13: N Brown

     

    14: T Moeroa ( Prop/ Lock/ 2nd row

    15: P Terepo ( Prop/ lock

    16: K Evans ( 2nd row/ Prop

    17: T Mannah ( Prop 

     

    when J Salmon comes back in round two I think he will be the perfect utility coming off the bench 

    who could cover the halves, centre, hooker, and lock 

    • Not a bad side. I don't know that G Jennings will play centre though (would be good to see him get a crack). Has he played there before? No utility on the bench but Marata could slot into centre if need be. I think Tep will start again with Brown off the bench, especially since he is coming off an injury.

      Agreed on Salmon, he gives the team a lot of options.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

EA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"We are so stacked at fullback that I would move Bloomfield to centre. Bamblett and Davis still there with Papalii and Twiddle in cup. Then we got a player in HM coming through named Lorima Seuseu. Only 16 next year. So a year young for HM. So…"
25 minutes ago
Michael W. replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"I like the signing of Kelly, it gives our outside backs, Russell and Simmonson a bit of competition. Most of the narrative around Kelly's signing has been about his terrible defence. I watched four Titans games from this year, his defence is not as…"
4 hours ago
Michael W. replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"It's a footy forum, and that should be it. We've lost quite a few good posters the last few years, I don't know whether it's because of politics, religion, racism, language or we have lost them because of the lack of success the club has had for…"
4 hours ago
Perpetual Motion replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"I read a few eels forums and there is always lots of infighting. Seperating the politics is a good idea as it is toxic and devisive. I actually think think the quality of this site has improved somewhat in the last year or so. "
5 hours ago
More…