Who misses out?

I know everyone is excited right now, and rightly so , but that was then and next week is six days away, so when Evans comes back into the side, who from todays effort misses out?Tep suddenly realised his time at Parra may be up, Alvaro never stopped trying, Stone was okay , energy in defense but dropped a sitter, Taka showed some class, Hard decision ,whaddya reckon?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Tepai, even though he had a blinder, he is dropped for Evans. Unless BA goes for size in which case it’s Stone. 

    • I suspect it might be stone, although i really like the little romper stomper mofo...

  • Lee Mossop for me! 

  • Yep I like Stone but I  say Coach follows on from his horrendous ' lets battle the Storm big men by putting Peni in hooker' decision from earlier this year , by keeping Tep and Alvaro and dropping Stone.Keeping Taka to cover injuries to the backs.I personally would leave Taka out and keep Stone who showed a lot of energy today.

  • Taka has x-factor which may be needed against the Storm. He should stay. Where the hell has that been from Tepai? If that was his standard I would have been gutted he's leaving. If he plays like that again I really want him to remain. He can take on Melbourne's forwards. Tough decision.

    • This reply was deleted.
      • Poppa I'm surprised you're still lucid this time of night. Thought you'd be pushing your drooling mouth along the floor by now.

  • There’s a few whispers that Dylan Brown will be suspended for a crusher tackle so we may need a 5/8!!!

    • Surely not....

      F all in that tackle.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Randy Handlinger replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"I totally agree, but they were arrogant...they were sure we would buckle.
Not Today Satan"
1 hour ago
Blue Eel replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Yep Badger, that sounds about right. If the Eels hold Zac's legal registered rights 2006-2008 to play NRL, then the Storm contract would be considered invalid as it goes against the strict conditions of the Eels release contract.
If the court was to…"
1 hour ago
KENDOZA replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"We do anyway"
2 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Members Forum 2026 Recap: Our Club is in Great Hands
"Only thing I'll say to this is having landed Galvin it aligns more to the Moses prime timeline and it's a like for like swap for DB.
Adaptive yes I completely agree as soon as that fell through the messaging changes and the club pivots."
3 hours ago
More…