Who is Better?

Who would you rather, a FULLY FIT Tom Trobjevic or James Tedesco. Personally, Tedesco has better fitness and tackle breaking ability. However, Turbo's aerial ability, passing/playmaking game and try saving ability is far more superior. So for me, because Trobjevic is better in more important aspects of the game, I would rather Tubo.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Turbo when fit is untouchable. Love watching him play. 

  • Tedesco every day of the week.

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Fully fit was the question?

  • which full back is more involved in a game ---Gutho

  • Fully fit I'd want turbo in my team.

  • Tedesco is the better fullback and is still the best fullback in the game, but Turbo is the better all round player. In other words I'd pick turbo over Tedesco in every other position.

  • It is the same question as 10 years ago,"'would you rather Hayne or Slater at the top of their game?"  Tedesco is more that Slater type, works very hard and is always around the ball.  This means is is far more consistent week to week and does all the 1% plays that many fans take for granted.  Turbo is more like Hayne. Not exactly in the way he plays but in terms of being a genuine X-factor that can break a game open on his own. I'd argue that he has more influence on a game for his team just like Hayne did. If Slater missed a game, storm would still be ultra competitive, similarly to Teddy now at the roosters.  Look how much better Manly were with Turbo in the team, just like how shit eels were when Hayne didn't play.  The importance players like Turbo and Hayne had and the effect on the players around them is unmeasurable.

     

    With this in mind, personally I see Turbo as the more complete player at his peak but personally I'd take Teddy as he is that constant threat for a whole season and won't drift in and out of games.

  • Do our answers to this question vary, depending upon the state of the team?

    Tedesco has been in form and mostly injury free for several years in a row. Turbo injury prone. 
    But also, Tedesco has the benefit of having been playing for a Roosters team good to great across the park. Tedesco is like icing on an already good cake. 
    Turbo appears to have the ability to turn an average team into a very good team. Maybe not a great team, but watching Turbo on the weekend, he was a constant threat. Wthe ball obviously, but also without the ball too, as Titans sent two to mark him so his decoy runs created space. 

    Both T's are great players. I'd probably take Turbo because he is more independently creative, but certainly if my team was struggling at halves or hooker. But if my halves and hooker were running a great show, Tedesco ices every half or even quarter chance. 

    PS: will the Blues have Tedesco, Turbo, Papenhuyzen and Gutho all in the team?!

    • I doubt Gutho will make the team. Tedesco will #1. Turbo either centre or wing and Papenhuyzen willl be #14. I don't see Gutho as a centre. I think there are better centres then him unfortunately. 

  • The both pale into insignificance when compared with The Great One...

    8806027263?profile=RESIZE_710x8806027274?profile=RESIZE_710x

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to LB's discussion The draw idea with 20 teams and the issues around it. (LONG BLOG)
"No it is relevant. You have a weaker conference, average teams get more points against much weaker teams. If you have a team with more wins but the other team gets higher seed or makes finals due to bonus wins that's not fair. They get the bonus…"
1 minute ago
Slippery. replied to LB's discussion The draw idea with 20 teams and the issues around it. (LONG BLOG)

 Having 1 conference stronger than another would matter at all. The extra points for conference wins are only available in your own conference, therefore the strength or weakness of your conference is irrelevant. The downside I see with the…"
15 minutes ago
LB replied to LB's discussion The draw idea with 20 teams and the issues around it. (LONG BLOG)
"Ok but firstly SL clubs would get annoyed those players can't stay. Players get annoyed they get shafted for NRL players. For 3 weeks not worth the while to get hurt. Paid extra money yet the game loses money with less product as stated before.…"
31 minutes ago
LB replied to LB's discussion The draw idea with 20 teams and the issues around it. (LONG BLOG)
"The more points is not fair as not both conferences are the same in quality. What if one conference is more difficult than the other? Plus the 3 higher ranked doesn't solve the issue of worse teams still getting in over better teams simply due to…"
58 minutes ago
More…