Eels Blogs

Replies

• 

  boffin November 4, 2010 at 5:01pm

  I thought punching someone else can under a civil matter so why should either club pay for his defense, he should have forked out the cash just like the rest of us would have to, seem to be a law unto themselves.
• 

  David November 4, 2010 at 5:09pm

  I'm a Year 11 Legal Studies student and I know for sure that assault is a criminal matter not civil but that's not the issue. The club originally offered to cover it for him though and so they're arguing about this.
• 

  Parraeels12 November 4, 2010 at 5:10pm

  BM you're exactly right. At the end of the day, shouldnt these solicitors have a cost agreement set up? The Cost Agreement should be enforceable on whoevers name is on there. If it is in fact Greg Inglis who signed the Agreement with no Authority signed that Storm would pay his bills then he is liable. However if Melbourne STorm were in fact the ones that signed the Agreement then they should be liable. I dont understand where the complication arises?
  
  As for Hodges, that little inbred sook should just go dig a hole for himself and never show his face in the NRL again, i cant stand that turd of the highest order.
• Fui Fui November 4, 2010 at 5:12pm

  The fact that a cheat like Inglis are even allowed to play in the NRL is charity enough.
  
  Now he's prepared to hold his club and the game to ransom for legal bills he incurred. After all, it was him that punched his girlfriend in the face... surely neither club are liable for that.
  
  Then for Justin Hodges to talk to the media about a situation he has no part of, that deserves a swift kickbox to the head.
• 

  George Taylor November 4, 2010 at 5:20pm

  Greg Bird and Greg Inglis, same crime:Assaulting Girlfriend, yet Bird gets on with it and pays his dues, Inglis carries on like a pork chop. Inglis man up and pay your dues.
• 

  seCtion eiGht November 4, 2010 at 5:25pm

  If Inglis wants to leave league, see ya, there will be another one come along soon, the game is bigger than any of it's players, he is a great player but he also has a massive head
• 

  tele1 November 4, 2010 at 6:42pm

  Weell said Bourbon Man - when i read about this my immediate reaction was WTF !!!!!
  
  Let me see, if I bashed my girlfriend , my employer will PAY THE FINE ??? WTF
  
  Memo to Inglis
  
  Man Up you GRUB - you hit your girl, not your employer, so how about....YOU PAY THE FINE....stop your whinging YOU GRUB and if you had half a brain, you would have paid the fine so that the issue would be finalised & would not be up for discussion in the public arena
  
  Stop being such a SPOILT SOOK Inglis....PAY YOUR FINE MORON !!!!!!!!!!
  
  BTW - how much money do you make for playing Footy - YES more than our Prime Mininster - so pay the measly $3000 and SHUT THE HELL UP......you big spoilt Baby !!!!!!!!
  
  BTW - Shame on you Hodges for supporting such immaturity by Inglis
  
  BTW - Shame on the Melbourne Storm for agreeing to pay the fine in the first place !!!
• 

  Chris Johnstone November 4, 2010 at 6:44pm

  Here here Bourbs......I'm with you.....
  
  Inglis should pay his own fine, not like he can't afford it.......
• 

  ELECTRIFYING MAXFORCE EELS 2014 November 4, 2010 at 7:03pm

  Can the NRL take action against players who place the game into negativity constantly ?Really ,last year we had (no names ) but a certain player criticise the NRL all year in public . The fact that he plays without being fined is a joke .
• 

  Morgs82 November 4, 2010 at 11:11pm

  Not saying I agree with gregs stance but from what i read brian waldron hired the lawyer and directed him to protect the image of the storm. Inglis was then advised when the legal bill reached 75k which he agreed to pay but then made an agreement with waldron for the storm to pay the rest. So I say to both parties man up pay your shares and F*n move on.