1. Guth
6. Moses
7. Salmon/Austin/Parcel
9. Austin/Parcel
14. Smith/ Parcel
Moses has gone backwards this year but backing him to turn it around next year
Dont think Mahoney is any where near ready
Dont think Bev is any where near ready for FB
King seems backup quality this - did look good last year
Kaysa seems like a good kid but just does not have the passing or vision for a first grade hooker
Smith is not a starting hooker or fullback. Could be 5:8 or 14.
would like to see how Salmon goes in first grade
Guth not sure about. On one hand he has the instincts and fitness for a fullback. On the other hand he is someone you want in the thick of it. Unless we have a better option for fullback I would have Guth there. We have other viable options for 5:8.
Norman is playing well but he wants to be the dominant half and does not seem to be able to make the right decisions, also for the sake of good club culture think we would be better without him. Moses has not been better at making decisions in the red zone this year - but would give him more time. Norman on the other hand has had his chances - is getting better but not good enough
Replies
Would love to know where the parcel rumour is coming from?
Mahoney played 80 on the weekend for 61 tackles with 4 misses and 45 run metres 250 kick metres for Wenty against a bears reserve grade side stacked with nrl players, espically the forward pack. He looks the good
1 Gutherson
6 Mahoney
7 Moses
9 Salmon
Gutho
Moses
Prichard
Does not matter as long as Moses and Pritchard are a part of it it will be like it is now absolutely crap and will never change as BA loves substandard players and can not spot talent even if it fell over him.
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next