What has Nic Weeks got against Parra

Apparently Nic Weeks wanted to make an example out of Kenny and ban him for 52 weeks for splashing drink on his partnerYet he did not try to make an example of Junior for punching a motorist in an act of road rageSeems like Nic harbours a grudge against usNot the first time he has treated us extremely harshlyWise move by Junior to move or he could have been out for two seasonsBTW the Lurker is also reporting Foran offered his services to Parra for next year (he felt he owed us)but was politely declined

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • would take foran for decent price maybe 600000

  • Foran offered his services to us ? LOL is that so when he signs back with Manly or the Bulldogs of any other fierce rival of us he can spin it in such a way that makes us look like this was all our fault and all our decision ?
  • Weeks probably has nothing against Parra. It would be great if the whiny conspiracy stories stopped. I thought we just had them because our disfunctional Board encouraged wild speculation?! That was so last year
    • Then explain Kenny versus Junior

      Next thing you will be telling me that Greg Hartley referred Parra Canterbury games fairly
    • Agreed, Brett, that it's not quite justice to be inconsistent. Funnily enough, I thus also agree with my critic Wile. I always bought Hartley was biased and the Kenny Paulo thing looks off
  • Is Weeks the new Paul Kent? Did he play 1 game for Parra and holds a life long grudge?.

    • Cant find anything on google

  • If it is true that Nick Weeks made public comments that Kenny should get 12 months ban, then his job is untenable and he needs to resign ASAP. Bernie Gurr has stated that Parramatta worked with the NRL on a resolution, and it appears that it was agreed a 7 week ban would ensue. Any other comment from either party is out of line and should be retracted.

    Of course this could also be another media beat-up, in which case they have been caught out big time.

    • Lurker reported that Weeks wanted a 12 month ban and was looking to make an example of Kenny
      So not exactly reliable
      Also possible 12 week morphed into 12 month
      If it was 12 week that was sought then it is extreme but I would retract my claim of bias
      But one year for pouring a drink is beyond fairness

      There were also comments that if the ban was 6 months to a year then Parra would have no choice but to sack Kenny. Again Lurker or someone not reliable but is consistent with Weeks seeking a one year ban
    • Again... Weeks and Greenberg are Muppets. I wholeheartedly agree IF he made those comments - his position is absolutely untenable.
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Cumberland Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion New signing at training ??? New guy
"Don't rate him at all . Still needs time in lower grades "
51 minutes ago
Gaz Nelson replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion New signing at training ??? New guy
"Good to see players are finally free to get around in their sports bras with Brown out of the picture. 
 "
1 hour ago
Acme replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion New signing at training ??? New guy
"Joash definitely did"
3 hours ago
ParraEels replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion New signing at training ??? New guy
"Didn't JAC have that last season"
3 hours ago
More…