You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"that's on Lomax, his agent and his legal team, not Parramatta. If R360 made promises to him they couldn't fulfil, its on Lomax to take R360 to court. "
"If you lost Joliffe would you replace him with Matto?....it's like replacing your car with a banana"
"R360 didn't exist at all when Lomax requested, and obtained, the release. It still doesn't. Lomax never had a contract there, as neither did any other player, including RTS. So, Lomax doesn't have an argument that his circumstances have changed. And…"
"Absolutely Melbourne have been cooking this up for months, no doubt in breach of anti-tampering laws. But the NRL don't want to go digging there again. "
Replies
Yes there was a few TCT tweets from Mitch - M, regarding 4 signings and one of those a 'massive' signing, they were asked to remove the tweets according to some, the blog that chief put up here screenshoting the tweet was removed too. im not surprised Brads pissed off if thats the case.
No idea mate
Just wait for the follow up "I told you so" blog in a few months when any player signs, regardless of it being massive or not.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 6 Next