The appointment of Ennis and Mcgregor as assistant coaches to Arthur may induce several interpretations___not all of them positive! Ennis is a talking machine that hogs every conversation. Whereas poor Mary, hardly offers the slightest whimper. One can see Arthur overcame l by the farrago of Ennis` advice while Mary does not get a word in. When Mary does say something and it is opposite to that of Doctor Ennis what does Arthur do? Ignore both of them? Surely we Eels are not paying big money to have their advice dismissed so considerately.
One ponders if Mary and Ennis have been selected as prospective coaches if and when Arthur stumbles again?---if you don`t come first you come last. I don`t think Ennis has coached at the NRL level whereas Mary has had much experience as an NRL coach without getting the bacon. Good luck to them both. We need movement at the station on the NRL coach.
Replies
I wondered the same robbie but arthur we know needs some creative ideas -
I'm excited by Ennius working with reed , mary was a great player
I hope BA is open to ideas , and less dogged in his thinking otherwise it could be alphabet soup lol
They're not assistant coaches. They are consultants. That's what consultants do, give you their advice. It's then up to the Head Coach and Club to decide if they want to follow that advice.
They're not prosective coaching alternatives. That theory makes zero sense to me.
Exactly
Mary ... may be part of a refund clause on the Dragons "Canadian Club" Corey Norman deal !
Ennis however should be useful !
Please can we not speak of that doofus again ?!
I braved a caravan park this week and I've realised I don't belong there after seeing the bogan brigades with their canadian club in their stubby holders
Good points raised Robert. The individual character egos are important in how you build teamwork relationships. A lot of the time you learn more by listening. I will say it again ---- by listening. We have had issues with that for some time now
What a load of usual Robert Lloyd crap. Both men have been appointed as consultants not assistants, which implies that they've been employed for singular and seperate purposes.
Brett I wouldn't,t be so hard on Robert mate. The definitions of how you use consultants or assistants can be as broad as you want them to be. The boundaries of how you use them should not be limited. They are interactive relationships and should be open to the expertise they can offer.
Absolutely tad
Brett if they are employed to give ideas and BA in not conducive to these or feels a touch intimidated ( by two past origin players when he has not played NRL) entirely plausible imo
there could be issues to be ironed out
I know he had Joey but there's two now
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
of 4 Next