In the previous 6 matches we have been flogged in the penalty count. Partricularly Mat Cecchin is reffing us.

Today w started off with a 5-0 penalty count, but still looked like the Eels of old could not score a try. It was not until the second try by Jennings that we started to gain confidence. As the match went on we started to really play well.

Its a pity that the game depends on the favourable penalties to gain momentum.

I think w have turned the corner and the players now have the confidenc to kick on.
One player I have bagged (amongst many) this season, Manu Mau had an outstanding game.
Who replaces Hayne on the wing?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • We tend to get a better go with the less experienced refs. I reckon the refs who have been around a while tend to ref on reputation.
  • Yep we got the 50:50s today and opposition were pinged when they were offfside. 

    Dont expect the same next week

  • I've been banging on about this for years. In round 2 2015 I couldn't believe how dodgy the refs were against parra when we played the dogs that year, I believed it's rigged ever since and of course Storm for the past 12 years, Roosters 2013.
    I was listening to the game while working and couldn't believe we got the calls. It helped us to build confidence.
    Don't expect it next week, we play a very strong and popular Tigers team, even i'm enjoying them winning the way they are. We will have to dig extremely deep to beat the tigers, no whinging though lets enjoy this week :)
  • But what did Moses say at half time and Norman at full time. We were more disciplined. We stopped getting offside or being lazy in the ruck and got pinged less for offside and holding in the ruck. 

    Yes, the flow of penalties can of course swing possession and too lopsided a possession count hurts a team. But our players were all saying discipline was the problem and they fixed it THIS game and won by 30 odd. Should not the headline be the difference discipline can make?

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Michael W. replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"This is how much the NRL looks after the "glamour" clubs. Shibasaki, current SOO and Australian rep, is on a miserly $140k this year. How does the NRL accept this."
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"He will fight for the vacant Port Kembla Heavyweight title and make a motza in pay-per-veiw...because everyone hates him now and watching him take some head-shots would be cathartic....villans get paid."
3 hours ago
KENDOZA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Teancum Brown pushing his case for R1
"Love how ryles is giving the young ones a crack"
6 hours ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"They have never been in a position of not getting what they want. They said when first started Ryles should just tell the board to let him go as they let him go, despite not letting him touch Storm players for 12 months, they also said the Sydney…"
9 hours ago
More…