As the heading says they don't want to plays us at Bank West next year and considering moving it back to ANZ . The reason being Bank West wont hold enough seating for both clubs fan base.As the reporter stated it had nothing to do with the scoreline of 82 to 24 to the Eels in both games played at Bank West .I think I got the scoreline right. I just read it in the paper and being an old fart the memory fades pretty  quickly. 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Nothing to do with the scoreline....yeah right! I thought they were arguing it was their home ground too the second time we played them!

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Tell me something i didn’t know any way look in the mirror and did you put the dog out for a pee

  • Isn't Anz stadium closed next year? 

    • Supposed to be the year after if Allianz is finished 

    • It is closing after SOO game 1

      • I think there has been a rethink with the uncertainty of Allianze and when it will be completed .but who knows

  • As long as it's a tigers home game not ours I'm fine with that, cowards lol

  • with rcg and maybe a few others coming to our club, it will make us a better side.. no wonder west tigers dont want to play us at bankwest.

    the trouble is  the nrl want as many games at bankwest as they can get, it the corp dollars there after, filling the corp boxs.

  • As long as we play the 2nd round at Bankwest.

  • The more games at Bankwest, the more $$$ for Parra leagues.

    Teams are welcome to call Bankwest their home when playing Parra  whilst getting dp-ed in the process.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Jimeoin replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Does anyone else think that PVL looks like the most dodgy used car salesman you could ever meet?
Apart from him getting games over the line during Covid and becoming a hero as a result, he appears as a shonky character and certainly someone I…"
2 hours ago
TolEllts replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Just so casual calling the game regulator to 'regulate' the Eels to their favor so they can get what they want. Isn't this attitude so demeaning for the Eels treating the organisation as a low life club that they can do whatever they want. Good for…"
2 hours ago
Nitram replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Um excuse me, how is this 'Melbourne Storm asked the NRL to "apply the blow torch" to Parramatta to release Zac Lomax' not the biggest story in nrl history? Is this fairdinkum? This is shocking stuff. Why is the melbourne storm ceo still in his…"
3 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Eelovution, Randy, That's a great idea mate.
Super is a member of the Supporters Group Alliance that meet with club bi-monthly. I'm not part of it.
However,  I have a suggestion. Let's set up a blog and I will ask Jim Sarantinos and maybe our…"
4 hours ago
More…