He 21 prop and Dogs have to chip in for next 2 years
- We need a prop or 2
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"650k is the same amount Trey Mooney is on. Would've been a handy signing but I heard we baulked on his asking price"
"I'd be ok with it as a centre and goal kicker.
Big risk but big reward "
Big risk but big reward "
"Nope , not even for free. More downside than upside . The baggage he brings with him wouid be like throwing fireworks in our dumpster fire. "
"Paulo was already gone and we were quite happy for him to do so. I was good with him at 600kish , I was even good with offering him a mutual second year . But he's truly shown his colours now as a greedy prick who couldn't give two fucks about the…"
Replies
Something is not right with him. He had massive wraps at warriors. But rapidly fell down the order and got an early release to go to th dogs this year. Now the dogs are already willing to let him leave.
He come cheap so worth a try i say we cant so say no him i say after all we are very thin on forwards
Think he's worth a look. Even better if he comes cheap and Dogs chip in.
I wouldn't be reading too much into his 'pecking order'. Clearly old Gus needs to free up some cap space over there. Some Dogs forwards are going better than expected (King, Preston and Curran) and probably will need an upgrade soon. Also they managed to land Leo Thompson so their forward stocks are looking good.
Dogs signed him 8 weeks ago now they want to let him go. Me thinks the doggies are over the cap and need to shed players asap....especially since latu has joined before June 30
The Dogs are definitely the new Chooks. Release some bum on $5.75 and then sign someone on $750K.
If the dogs chipped in a good percentage of his contract then yes. If he is motivated correctly he could be the gun impact middle forward we need off the bench.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwF7KnW0CQw