Its one or the other, What do people think Sandow was dropped for??
And to be honest if he was dropped for form there are others who have been playing worse than him, and we say replace cause there is a better replacement somewhere else, Not with Sandow he was playing really well, and replace him with Kelly?, who just passes and kicks?, at least with Sandow you feel he could all of a sudden win you a game in crucial moments
If it was Off field than I understand, as long as its 1 game, if we V warriors, as long as Kelly has a blinder which very unlikely Sandow should be back in regardless, but he wont, BA loves Kelly hes the new sef
all the media are saying another off the field incident, this is the only thing he has done, and maybe the gambling thing but that's it
he get treated like hes a liability off the field when this is his first major incident and there are way worse than this that haven't been put in the media
He plays for Parramatta and is on 550K, media hopes he fails, if he was with Melbourne or Brisbane or Sydney City they'd be supporting him
Replies
He's a good young kid but needs to concentrate on his career instead of off-field situations. Easier said than done though!
Yes, all his good form is off field.
It could be a combination of both form and the off field car incident. I was just reading an article in the Telegraph by Adrian Prozenko saying it was on field form, so who knows.
I don't really mind, to be honest. His 5th tackle options have been terrible. No pressure on the other team or repeat sets. Might be good to have Kelly for a game, if he can bring things back to basics for us. Our team never seems sure of what Sandow will do next....