Replies

  • It's a no brainer. Why BA moved back to Centre was stuff of idiots. Even the WAQA fans woulda admitted that. 

  • So who's at left centre next year?

    • Keep training Perham at centre. See how Dunster and Simonson go at centre. Otherwise release Simonson and go on the market. Also have Loizoiu coming through.

  • Waqa has the perfect body shape attributes to be REP level winger. He has good top speed, he has great post contact metres and can find the tryline. In teh modern game the back 3 are so important and we need to make 1-3 tackles count.  I say stick to it BA.

  • I don't know of anyone (other than BA) who thinks he's better at centre.

  • I called this for years. Blind freddy can see it. Finally, perhaps BA might have also woken up.  This is WB's best positon, always has been regardless of whether he likes it or not.

  • We are a way better team with Opacic in the centres and Waqa on the wing. Nothing against Simonsson but Waqa is the kind of bloke that just finds the ball, he's great to kick for and we can kick early for him to chase. He's the perfect winger to complement Sivo

    • Spot on.

      There is no way in hell Simonsson would have scored that try on Friday. He wouldn't have even caught the pass from JA.

      Opacic as a far better centre than Blake to.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights.  Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
17 minutes ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
38 minutes ago
Eelovution replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"When the announcement was made by the Eels regarding the dispute with Lomax, the club made a very important note in their commentary- the agreement was made in 'Good Faith'. This is a very important principle in legal agreements- both parties agree…"
2 hours ago
RB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Yeah, but does that count if the opportunity never eventuated, is what I think they'll argue"
2 hours ago
More…