Replies

  • I could see Broncos taking him in a heart beat. That's his preference and Broncos really need to fix their defence. Watched Arthars recently at centre and his defence is hopeless. Mariner is a winger only too. Real case for Opacic to be in their first choice team rather than depth.

    1. Walsh
    2. Mariner
    3. Opacic
    4. Staggs
    5. Cobbo

    Would be a great back up at eels though if we could. 

    • He suits Bronco's because he has pace around him, he would have no benefit to Parra going forward.

  • Lomax

  • Opacic is class on and off the field. Take him back in a heartbeat 

    • Yep 

      • Double yep!

  • I'd take him as he's cheap and is a blue collar player, just wondering where he fits where we need speed already having Lomax, Penisini and Gutho for Centre spots.

  • Definitely in a centre mentor like role similar to Gower.

  • We're stacking up in the backs and if we get more they'd need to be someone more worth it as I'd rather our backups be the youngsters, BUT there is no doubt he did well for us and seems like a good bloke. So wouldn't mind him but maybe not a fit now.

     

  • Should have never been let go massive loss when he left 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

JC replied to Kurupt - Your Mums Favourite Thug's discussion DISGRACEFUL REFEREEING AGAIN!!!
"The touchy called that one."
12 minutes ago
Angry Eel replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Should we keep Kelma?
"Totally get where you're coming from. I can't help but think how good he can be when he wants to. "
12 minutes ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Should we keep Kelma?
"I understand where your coming from Angry but I still think we'd be better off using that roster spot for someone who will take that opportunity and prove they belong. He has a poor commitment level and professionalism."
16 minutes ago
D_STOFFBERG replied to Angry Eel's discussion 3,2,1
"3 iongi, 2 Volkman, 1 kelma"
18 minutes ago
More…