The Return Of Joey Lussick

I'm of the understanding that Joey Lussick has an NRL get out clause in his contract with St Helens.

During his time filling in I thought he added great service and had some dynamic runs form dummy half.

He'd slot straight back into the team and fit in well with his old team mates.

Would you take him back?
What's your preferred hooker choice with who we currently have?
Who would you like us to get considering we've only put a max $600k value on the Hooker position?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Well of who we have preferred choice based on ability is Mahoney and he will be picked unless he leaves or is injured

     

    after that it has to be Rein for now, but would like to see how Hands goes in NSW cup

    • I think he means for 2023 mate after reed leaves 

      • Oh my apologies

        in that case I wouldn't mind Lussick back at all but there some better options, but if Lussick is all that is left then not a bad option

        • Yep I agree 

  • Go hard for B Smith first and if we fail, which we will considering we only know how to low ball, then bring Lussick back. 
    Some people here are saying that former panthers player is good. I have never seen him play but I wouldn't think much of him considering Kenny was infront of him in the pecking order at panthers. 

    • he's younger than Kenny EA and was being talked about as going past him.....pretty good highlights reel on him here.

      I understand penrith were surprised and disappointed to lose him, he already has shown excellent vision by coming here LOL

  • will smith into number 9

     

    • Will Smith is gone.  He is no longer with the Club.

       

      • ...much to Carlo's dismay

  • Play Rein next year then get him back for 23 I thought we went better with him than reed towards the end of the season 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Prof. Daz replied to Poppa's discussion Another View
"Surely any argument from Lomax about "Eels don't want me back" would lead to questions about why Lomax thinks he should be trusted, given his breach of obligations? Also, best case scenario for Lomax claiming to went to return is "fine, no cap space…"
16 seconds ago
Prof. Daz replied to Poppa's discussion Another View
"Fact you, Poppa. I out fact you in my reply. You can fact me later. "
5 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Poppa's discussion Another View
"Poppa, your argument is as follows: "We are actually taking action against him for damage that does not exist by our admission" (Poppa). 
No, the damage was initiated by Lomax's breach of contract, rather than terminating with said breach. The…"
5 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Why Academics Suck
"My Head Hurts.
Did someone say footy starts soon."
9 minutes ago
More…