The Return Of Joey Lussick

I'm of the understanding that Joey Lussick has an NRL get out clause in his contract with St Helens.

During his time filling in I thought he added great service and had some dynamic runs form dummy half.

He'd slot straight back into the team and fit in well with his old team mates.

Would you take him back?
What's your preferred hooker choice with who we currently have?
Who would you like us to get considering we've only put a max $600k value on the Hooker position?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Well of who we have preferred choice based on ability is Mahoney and he will be picked unless he leaves or is injured

     

    after that it has to be Rein for now, but would like to see how Hands goes in NSW cup

    • I think he means for 2023 mate after reed leaves 

      • Oh my apologies

        in that case I wouldn't mind Lussick back at all but there some better options, but if Lussick is all that is left then not a bad option

        • Yep I agree 

  • Go hard for B Smith first and if we fail, which we will considering we only know how to low ball, then bring Lussick back. 
    Some people here are saying that former panthers player is good. I have never seen him play but I wouldn't think much of him considering Kenny was infront of him in the pecking order at panthers. 

    • he's younger than Kenny EA and was being talked about as going past him.....pretty good highlights reel on him here.

      I understand penrith were surprised and disappointed to lose him, he already has shown excellent vision by coming here LOL

  • will smith into number 9

     

    • Will Smith is gone.  He is no longer with the Club.

       

      • ...much to Carlo's dismay

  • Play Rein next year then get him back for 23 I thought we went better with him than reed towards the end of the season 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"So what you're saying is i shouldn't be blowing off too early.  Fair enough "
2 minutes ago
Hector replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"It will all come down to the supreme court justice. Just hope he  she or whoever aint a storm Bulldogs Rroosters or any other team Bar us supporter Fingers crossed 🙄🙄🙄"
4 minutes ago
Seraph replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Interesting first and second points BE.
Considering how he signed with Parra via BA, there could very well be something there that may give his side some argument"
8 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"For the lawyers ... what is the Eels' likely defense here, beyond "it's a signed voluntary contract?"
We assume in other words Lomax lacks sufficient ground to say he was not in a position to know, lacked legal guidance, was under duress or coerced…"
15 minutes ago
More…