That’s 3 long term injuries because of foul play.

J'maine Hopgood, Isaiah Iongi, Bailey Simonsson. 
All long term injuries because of foul play. 
Seems a little unfair. Surely the NRL needs to consider some sort of compensation for this injustice. They need to step in. A team like ours needs some kind of help. 
I feel for the players. Foul play ends a good chunk of their season. 

Other concerns from today:  

Russell - Concussion. 
Foxx - looked like he copped a rib injury. 
Moses - look to struggle with groin. 
Pezet - Hamstring 

 

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Considering all three were deemed to be foul play, yeah exemption is necessary there. In that case we could get a Winger from another club.

  • But we stuck it to the NRL at the start of the year. Give it a 0.01% chance of them givng anything to us. The refs make it clear lol.

    • I still stand by what we did though. The fact the NRL do that is fraud pretty much as they should be neutral.

  • Ryley smith also went off in golden point.  Couldn't walk.

  • The fight from the boys was unbelievable.  To play 50 odd minutes with no recognised centre. Basically  half a game with a hooker at 5/8 and 25 minutes with no right winger or right centre.

    The effort deserved some points. Some key mistakes from players. Williams dropped ball and Pezel early kick come to mind. Kelma and Kelly drops. But some calls that were so crucial. 

    1.Jack Williams trying to play the ball with 3 people on him and gets tackled. That should be a professional foul and 10 in the bin. 

    2. Blatant strip on Kelly. Lead straight to points.

    3. Head clash penalty. Lead straight to points. 

    4. Blatant knock on, on half way late in the game ignored. 

    5. Not a high tackle from Tuivati. 

    All pretty crucial calls against us.

     

  • Another area of concern is Hooker. We have nothing behind Da Silva. If Smith is out, can Da Silva play full 80? Doubt it, we need another Hooker.

    • Remember how I pointed that out and people had a go at me lol

      • No you're right. papalii can do a job there if we have the backs fit but we don't.

        I always thought we should have given Lussick another year. 

    • Might have to look at Kings Cross plenty there apparently 

  • Ryles says Russell is fine in the press conference! Doubt there will be any compensation as the Eels aren't Penrith or the Storm 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Prof. Daz replied to CarloEEL2's discussion It’s a no from the red bandana
"Seems Wiz is unable to grasp moral vs legal impairment, including why assuming reckless driving due to above-zero drug count is incorrect. 
You know what they say, if it's too much for your small brain, just don't comment "
2 minutes ago
Wizard “Alcatraz “Sleeve replied to CarloEEL2's discussion It’s a no from the red bandana
"If he was suspended due to an act at work ( playing for the club)  , then yes his salary would and should be covered.  But do you think he should be paid what 115k ? For getting on the bags and driving whilst hes serving his suspension ?  It's…"
13 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Paulo standoff with Eels
"$650k per year is nothing to sneeze at! I wouldn't mind that per year"
17 minutes ago
Wizard “Alcatraz “Sleeve replied to CarloEEL2's discussion It’s a no from the red bandana
"And you'd be wrong.  Laws stance is zero tolerance.  The amount of words you can post on the wall of text you both  wrote or level of impairment is as relevant as what thongs he was wearing. You wish to change the laws , go for gold, it'd be…"
24 minutes ago
More…