You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"The long term option at 6 is Lorenzo? "
"HFK, If I'm wrong about Pezet & he turns out to be a complete lemon, so be it. We all get things wrong, make mistakes, make assumptions that prove to be wrong. Better to focus on improving ourselves, between the ears, bit by bit, than being right."
"Whether there is a definitive answer or not, it'll have nothing to do with us signing Pezet. He was only available for 2026. He had already signed with the Broncos long term from 2027."
"I have been highly critical of the decision and have copped a little blow back for it, let's see in 12 months time with the eels heading into the 2027 season if they don't have a definitive answer on who will be our long term 6 if the people…"
Replies
Short answers will sufice...
Changing the number on a players back means nothing EP.
In my opinion your recollection of Mitch playing his best footy at Wests is incorrect. Both Brooks and Moses are halfbacks who like to control the game at half. They rarely played well together similar to Moses and Norman for that very reason. When Brooks was injured through the second half of 2016 Moses played half and directed the team around the ground where he won the game ball in about 5 out of the 7 or 8 games during Brooks absence.
Good idea but Norman has been terrible. His kick for touch last week was disgraceful. He does not run straight. He tries to swerve here and there and gets nowhere. I would rather he went elsewhere.
Look at there stats Norman and mosses other than goal kicking are pretty similar.
Norman won't improve as he knows hes on his last legs ..... he is being offered to other clubs - I would love a swap with raiders for Blake Austin who loves running and leave the organising to MM.
But I would expect coin on transfer as they are not in same pay bracket
I willing to give it a go cant go any worse then we are now so ye go for it
switcharoo the forwards first
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next