Stitch up went wrong for the NRL?

Well, a wins a win but seriously, did the NRL try and stich us up tonight.? 
71 minutes of football and the penalty count was 9-1 Titans.. We finally got one in the 71st minute despite owning territory for the first 40 minutes. Add a soft sin bin and the allowance of son,e  questionable challenges and a sin bin... granted I'm biased but...... WTF?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Yep... agreed Brissy. I was worried about this one but did not expect the bias... WOW.

  • Work experience kid with the whistle 

  • I am one who says incompetence before corruption. However, if ever a game looked like a stitch up, tonight's was it. For all the reasons Archie & Brissy have outlined. 

    • I'm with you My Bob, I'm hard on what we do wrong to give the opposition a chance before looking for excuses but tonight was beyond the pale..

    • This reply was deleted.
      • I can't argue with that. As I say, if ever there was evidence of something off with the officials tonight was it. 

  • I froze the fifita try from behind and through my blue and gold coloured eyes it looked like his elbow is on the line as he grounds the ball.

    Even it it wasn't how the didn't have a closer look is diabolical 

    • Spot on. Even fifita got up saying he didn't make it.

    • the mere fact they didn't have another look at that try with a smidgin in it tells the cheating refs story

       

    • Notice how they only show one angle and one angle only? even if it didn't go to bunker broadcast shows all angles. Do they just want to leave it as a wonderful try and not have anything ruin it?

  • The refereeing was very inconsistent.  Paulo gets 10 in the bin for a shoulder on shoulder hit confirmed by Brimson himself!  But nothing is said for the high hit to Opacic by Herbert in our in goal area in the first 5 mins of the second half.  That hit was straight across the chin.  Nothing!

    No penalties for 71 mins?  Holbrook cannot cry about the refereeing tonight!  

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Prof. Daz replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Why Academics Suck
"Poupou, how is my example "sophistry"? Which is plausible but invalid reasoning.
Your example to demonstrate my sophistry does not unpack the actual example, instead you divert to a red herring about degree of specifity (about what you are unclear).…"
14 minutes ago
Tin Tim replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Vlandy's - NRL will register Lomax new deal
"Well you didn't think this NRL is currupt it's certainly looking that way. V'landys has shown no backbone here & is helping one club & one club only. Of all the shit Parramatta have copped over the year, shit decision on so many levels this one take…"
21 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Why Academics Suck
"Poupou, how - specifically - do academics "appeal to their own authority"? Look at your own example, which does NOT display the fallacy of argument from authority. If X says a degree has utility value for Y because X can teach Y how to think not…"
25 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Vlandy's - NRL will register Lomax new deal
"V'Landys tries to hide his hypocrisy in this whole Lomax Affair by seeking to shift sympathy toward Lomax, asking who would "knock a bloke that's trying to do the best for himself". But that shifting of ethical primacy toward Lomax contradicts…"
42 minutes ago
More…