Spot the difference, one gets sin binned and 4 weeks suspension, the other stays on the field and gets a fine during the week.
Luai a fine.
Sivo 4 weeks suspension and sin-binned.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"How dare you accuse me of such BS. Where's Poppa?"
"Politis knows business."
"How come Roosters have so many 3rd Party Deals. Are Eels board just total 'Party Poopers' "
Seems that the indigenous people of Australia ( A particular Tribe) are looking to claim a large proportion of Melbourne as native title so they can make sure the region is looked after correctly. The Waterways, native lands etc..Is this ok and do…
Replies
MRC , Bunker and standard of referring in 2023 is very ordinary. Tough job but there appears to be ZERO consistency and accountability. We have had our season dictated by officials more than once.
There is a difference
One plays for Parramatta who's demise sells papers
One plays for Penrith who are going for a feel good 3 in a row story.
An undeserved 3 in a row story
There is a difference
One plays for Parramatta who's demise sells papers
One plays for Penrith who are going for a feel good 3 in a row story.
So where is the correlation between selling papers and the NRL ?
More so that nobody is mentioning it, Sivo's was mentioned a lot that he should get heaps of weeks, Luai nothing mentioned.
Should have been more clear i guess.
Hooper made a deal of it in the paper yesterday and on Triple M on Sunday.
$$$$
I mean the obvious answer is Sivo was making a tackle, with an attempt to wrap the arm. Whereas sh!t-for-brains makes no attempt to wrap the arm and leads with the shoulder. So one is a dangerous contact and one is careless.
Difference is that Sivo actually tried to tackle the guy. Luai just tried to smash the guy with a shoulder.
If Luai got same charge and it was only his 2nd then the 3K is standard.
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next