You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"That's nothing new though right I mean sticky was saying his team made 60 odd tackles before his team saw the ball and still came back and won.It feels like you could go to almost any contest any week and pick apart these wild inconsistencies within…"
"Some players need to get sacked from a club and risk losing it all before they really knuckle down and put in the work. Why did he get sacked, was it lack of discipline for footy and training or off field issues?"
"Nah I didn't watch the game I don't have too watch one game for my statement to be made I've seen enough in 2 years. His overrated"
Replies
Norman is probably not fast enough for FB. I think BA would like both Sandow and Norman fighting out a half spot next year. Just depends on what $$$ Chrissy is willing to accept.
Sandow without a shadow of a doubt.
His game compiements foran, i think with foran to share the load a lot of pressure will be taken off chris, his game will go to a new level, and Coreys game is similar to Foran just a cheaper and poorer player.
Chris has the x factor Corey doesnt, hes a game winner on his day, as well as a big kicking game and he can goal kick.
Id be ok with norman going to FB, but its chrissy over norman any day to partner Foran.
X2
With our possible soon to be salary cap issues i can't see us re-signing Sandow, even if he is willing to take a paycut. Rumours are going saying Lussick is leaving, which is a good start to free up some money. Sandow leaving would be another lump sum of money in our favor.
Sandow hasn't worked out for us in four years where Norman has showed improvement. The money we would have left over from offloading both Lussick and Sandow would be a great way of getting another big signing, possibly Izzy.
I believe we have already made an offer to Sandow which he is yet to accept. I don't think Hoppa has accepted our offer yet. I would agree Lussick will go. So we are not in a bad financial position. Whichever way you look at it we still have to sign 25 players. You can'.t just say Sandow + Lussick = Izzy because we are one player down. Far better to have Lussick = Johnston.
Sandow has had enough time to stand up. It's not often a club wins a premiership without a top line halfback or set of decent halves.
I'm just not happy with Sandows consistency. It's not good enough to have a couple blinders a year and play terrible the rest of the time.
Time to go chrissy.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 15 Next