Smith

Why aren’t we looking at cam smith !! Thoughts??

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Because he has no interest in leaving Melbourne, and we also don’t have the cap space to make even a semi serious offer.

  • Cause we saving up for Hayne dumb dumb. Isn’t that what you said? Lol
    • Hayne will play no doubt. My blog was about smith dumb arse
    • Hayne has publicly declared that he is not finished in the NRL just yet, he was on record yesterday saying 'I want one more bight of the cherry'.
  • Because look st the TPAs he gets down in Melbourne.
  • How do you expect to cover his contract? Plus he is not leaving Melbourne. Perhaps we should actually look at Brandon Smith.

  • It would have a lot to do with the insane amount of money required & the fact that he was never leaving Melbourne.

  • He cut off his friendship with Cronk because Cronk joined another club

    He would look like a right Wally if he then did that too

  • He retire before hes plays for us

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Longfin Eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"The trouble with Melbourne is that they have been in the competition now for about 27 years. I'm yet to see any local players that have come through the ranks to play NRL. Compare that to Sydney Swans, who by 2009 (27 years) had many local players.…"
30 minutes ago
Longfin Eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"V'lanys' position is becoming untenable. What poor leadership he has shown through this matter. The only thing on his mind is a big dollar sign, with the clubs and fans nowhere to be seen."
37 minutes ago
Acme replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"V'Landy's sincerely cares about Lomax's mental health. He (rightfully) sees it as his responsibilty to give regular, personal updates to the public on Zac's mental well being, as he does for all players. Thank goodness we have a genuinely thoughtful…"
43 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"That won't stand up in court, and everyone know's it's just a PR exercise, so they can play that game if they want to. No one is buying it."
1 hour ago
More…