The point of getting top 4 is getting a chance of a rest during the final series.

Why not make it a certainty by resting finals game one. 

Usual option

Fight Tooth and nail against a top 4 team and risk injury and suspensions to maybe get a rest next week then face two games against the best teams or face a lowere placed team after being weakened and then two of the best teams

Alternative 

Take your rest in the first final. Then play a lower placed team with a full rested roster. Then after the warm up play the two best teams. Hitting the lower placed team at full strength is not only more chance of a win but if we do not need to struggle we have less chance of injury and suspension 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Honestly, cannot believe you even posted this as a suggestion.

    • Strategically it was our best option

      Storm threw the Round 20 game to make sure they were strong for the finals

      What is the difference?

      We had a hard Round 20 game and hit week one weakened and with DB stretched. We were playing a fully fit and rested Storm in Brisbane. 

      Discretion is the better part of valour. We had the opportunity to rest week 1 and hit Souths fully fit. Now we hit them weakened.

  • This reply was deleted.
  • The advantage of winning week one is that you have a rest and play a team that has had 2 tough finals games.

     

    resting week 1 just means you only play one tough finals game before playing a rested team.

  • no. never. you play hard and go for the week off and one more game to get into the grand final. potentially equaling a three game finals series instad of a four game series.

  • No I reckon we should rest them this week for the Panthers game...

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Perpetual Motion replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"We have so many second rowers, Warbrick is one head knock away from retirement. We would take Steph or Coates but melbourne are not giving them up. More likely to come down to if Ryles thinks Howarth is a fair value replacement and then Howarth has…"
47 minutes ago
Perpetual Motion replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"And a micro pig."
56 minutes ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Eels demand one of three Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"Would take any of them. Or as the girl said in the Old El Paso ad "Why not both?" Or change it to "Why not all?"
Dah dah dah dah da da da.
Of course, and they have every right to, offer us fringe nobodies for an International Winger. I mean they are…"
1 hour ago
Perpetual Motion replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"The pressure is on Lomax. He is unemployed and has a McMansion to keep up payments on.
Without a Wallabies top up the average value of a Super Rugby Australian player contract is estimated to be around $100,000 to $150,000 AUD per year. The minimum…"
1 hour ago
More…