If Sandow is out for the first few games (against some of the top teams)...
Who would you like to see replace him?
Not who should replace him - that will be Kelly.
1. Kelly
2. Quinlan
3. Matterson
4. ZDC
5. Seffa
6. IDG
7. Peats
8. Brad Arthur
Personally I would love to see Matterson get a run - but maybe better a bit later in the year
Replies
There's a bit of talk that he might not be fit but the general consensus seems to be that come Rd 1, he'll be fine.
As much as I'm not a fan of the guy, Luke Kelly.
I don't rate Quinlan as anything but a fullback but the logjam for that is huge.
Matterson & ZDC whilst immensely talented and future first-graders, are not ready for the grind, physicality and level of play in the NRL. Neither has a full NSW Cup season behind them which they need if they are to play, so they can become accustomed to the different style of play compared to the Holden Cup.
And neither Seffa, IDG or Peats have the complete skill set to play halfback.
If BA played halfback in his day, get him in there.
I heard BA was too small for the forwards so he must be right to be a half back
and he has coached, captained and played (at the same time) before
So about time he stopped shouting charge and started shouting follow me!
In some ways, it could be a blessing that Sandow is out of the pre-season because it means all the halves will get more time and someone like ZDC will get a full game for Wenty and the possibility to show what he's got. If we can have Zach challenging Kelly and Matto challenging Norman, it'll be very useful for the team's overall chances
Yeah but not for Manly
For Manly I wanted to see the guys with their head on the chopping block go toe to toe with their would be replacements
I don't rate Quinlin as a 7. He is a good runner of the ball and 2nd receiver/ distributor, but not a 7. I think he was brought in to cover injuries to the halves (generally) and as another option at fullback - but I would like our young guys to get first crack.
Kelly is is a waste of time to invest in any further.
The rest are not with considering.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next