Replies

  • Agree he gave a lot more.

    • At least we agree on something
  • Lol.
  • That statement alone shows how far we've fallen. Because Sandow was a liability.

  • You can't blame one player but I thought this all year that at least Sandow used to had a go. They played well till 50min or so. Roosters did not hit their straps till sin bins. My tuppence worth I know forwards win games but a good halfback will help this side immensely. Bag Mannah all you like but he tried his heart out as did Gower. Roosters seem a team of individuals to me and Eels made them look good from sin binnings onwards they capitalise on other teams mistakes. They did play a game a few weeks back that was impressive. Oh no just announced the Warriors play Panthers football sucks.
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Adam Magrath replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Teancum Brown pushing his case for R1
"Chief given where we are at, are you in the market for a top tier prop? "
1 minute ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Teancum Brown pushing his case for R1
"Nah, he used to box fat and it doesn't get easier to lose as you get older...Ozempic, not that there's anything wrong with that. Every trainer always tried to pul weight off of Jnr forever, but to no avail. Now? Easy-peasy"
7 minutes ago
Parra-all-the-way replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Trial #2 / Pre Season Challenge Week 3 Team List v Sydney Roosters
"Agreed, Russell was nearly our best player last week, and was going pretty good by the time the year finished in 2025"
19 minutes ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Trial #2 / Pre Season Challenge Week 3 Team List v Sydney Roosters
"I mean perhaps, but he can still play some decent minutes in NRL trial too. It's a trial so doesn't matter if he is a risk with his fitness in terms of fatigue errors."
28 minutes ago
More…