Salary Cap explanation

Now call me dumb but I know salary cap is about 8 Mil, please explain how it is spread out is that over the 25-30 players?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • So every team has a set salary cap to spend.. except Broncos, Storm and Roosters. Also, you can’t really expect us fans to know when the administrators of the game don’t have a clue.
  • It is spread over the top 30 players. It can be spent in every way as long as the total amount is under the nominated cap.
  • Thought it was 9 mil over 30 next year
    That is average of 300k per player
    If a team has 4 players taking up $3 mill and the bottom 11 taking up $1 mil
    That leaves $5 mil between 15 players or about $330k per player
    • Your numbers go up the more you spend?
  • Creative accountancy and brown paper bags.

  • So no reason why 3 players can't be on $1mil per season
    • Everyone else would have to average at about $200k though. I don't think that is feasible, especially with rep players.
  • Where did you find this info Brett?

  • http://www.nrl.com/nrlhq/referencecentre/salarycap/tabid/10434/defa...

    That's the salary cap page but it is only current for this year's salary cap.

  • It's a dumb allowance. It is capped at $600k and every club gets it, so it's no different from the rest of the salary cap. It doesn't even need to go to a marquee player. As far as I can tell its only purpose is to provide plausible deniability for players receiving under the table TPAs. When they get caught they can just say "I thought it was part/all of the marquee player allowance!"

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Flow Basket replied to Blue Eel's discussion Trial #2, Game Day Blog v Roosters: We Just Won the Pre-Season Cup
"U can't have lightning breaks with beer prices so high and the way their checking bags just feels like someone's making money .while  kids over the road  standing in the rain with a fishing rods"
29 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 posted a discussion
Based on the pre-season trials, training reports, and incumbency, I’ve settled on a top 19 that largely picks itself — particularly the starting top 13, which I think is pretty much locked in.Samrani, for mine, has done enough to be locked into a…
37 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to LB's discussion Melbourne's Matterson offer
"It would not surprise me either Mr Captain, not one little bit.
We are also, by design, a leaky ship right now. Scary stuff for a puppet master"
40 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to LB's discussion Melbourne's Matterson offer
"So we would be left with $4ook freight...I thought they offered some bullshit like this
Fuck I hate Melbourne"
44 minutes ago
More…