why didn’t they take 2 pts? For and against pts are always worth it. What am I missing?
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"If you look at it from a player for player deal, would you rather Lomax or Howarth if you are the Storm but ? I just don't see any way legally the storm can force the eels to hand them Lomax 🤣 either way don't really care what storm end up doing but…"
"I know i have said it before but Storm fans say we are being unreasonable and see no outcome in which we win this case. Despite all the released, that is still the belief. I believe in bias and backing your team but come on.
But i do not think they…"
But i do not think they…"
"Wouldn't shock me if storm come to the table at the 11th hour with Howarth and the transfer fee. No way in hell they win this in court "
"Same, Kurupt. Whatever the outcome, Jim, Beach, Ryles and the club stood united and stood their ground when they were meant to roll over for the Storm and PLV, discreetly. Moses SC has also been brilliant."
Replies
why did this need a new topic?
Righto blog Nazi
lol Nick thats RACIST!!!
If they take the shot and it hits the post and ricochets the ball could potentially still be in play. Sharks pick it up and run the length of the field.
Unlikely but that’s why they didn’t take the shot.
We did the same thing last year vs Tigers and everyone was filthy for the 2 points. Common sense in my mind.
Zer waz olredi a blog on ze geim, verstehen?
Ok, I get it. A potential Cariage moment. It was more or less in front though
One minute's silence for the punter that had Saint's to win by 6+. :-)
Goal kicker had a sore foot.