Replies

  • Good to see JAC come in

    I'm glad Samrani kept his spot and Russell got the boot.

    Hands is average but Lussick is just absolute shit. Not sure what Kearney 2.0 is thinking about here.

    • Probably wants some line speed in the first 20m. I dont really mind it because smith will be on for 60 minutes

    • This reply was deleted.
      • He has been poor at best but even his poor games are better than 90% of Lussick's games.

        • This reply was deleted.
          • I understand that but replacing poor with utter crap is just as bad.

      • Paulo should of been dropped 3 years ago..

        • if we drop Paulo who do we bring? We dont have the roster to accomodate it

          • Anyone, he doesn't get massive metres, lead the tackle count or put on any hits. May as well play lussick prop as you get the same inept go forward 

        • Should have kept RCG and got rid of Paulo

    • I would have preferred a rotation of Arthur and Smith at hooker. Either one on the bench in 14. I just got a feeling that would have worked.

      • I would prefer Joash on the bench.

        When Smith needs a break, move Brown to hooker and Joash to 5/8.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Poppa replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"The dog ain't that hot anymore Krupty, but with a bit of sauce and a touch of mustard..... you never know? lol"
6 hours ago
LB replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"They will, question is by year 2 or 3 how many of those signings see it out."
6 hours ago
LB replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"He's been on record saying he would never play against his dad again."
6 hours ago
LB replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"The tax free money is great but this can still fail if the compound doesn't fit with what players and their family want. Some might get to the end of year 1 and think "stuff this I want out." 
PNG could be a revolving door of players and it will…"
7 hours ago
More…