Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • That was the point of putting this up. If we went into the knit picking of this game you will find that around 9 times in the game the Warriors were were given the olive branch from the refs, while we were given it 3 times, if I remember correctly - it was something like this. The point is we won the game regardless of al the crap reffing going on. 

      • This reply was deleted.
        • This reply was deleted.
  • Who cares, he had to slow down to catch it, he caught it way in front from where the ball was passed, it was called a forward pass and you move on. It could have been the winning pass. We would be here saying, look how it travelled forward. Again, who cares we move on. Bring on the Dragons!!! 

  • It went a little forward from the point he threw it but maybe was not forward relative to where he would have been if he kept travelling at the same velocity. 50/50 decision by the same refs and linesmen that missed an obvious Warriors knockon that led to their second try and was a major turning point in the first half. The refs seemed to make a bad decision and then try to even it up and were constantly chasing their tails trying to even up

  • Ball came out of his hand backwards then floated forward. Play on, try, warriors win.

    • You can’t say Warriors win. There was still 4 minutes left and we play the last 4 minutes completely differently if we were behind. Parramatta has probably been on the wrong end of these sort of calls no less than 4 or 5 times this year. The referee ruled on this and he was in the best position anyone in the ground was to rule on it. They are in a no win situation here. The bunker can’t rule, they alone have to make a decision. If he lets it go on, plenty of Parramatta supporters would be unhappy if wasn’t ruled forward. 

      • Warriors win.

  • thought it was a try live

  • Forward to me.

  • It was forward. I have seen Foxtel footage illustrating exactly where the players were when the ball was passed and where it was caught. The player catching the ball is at least two metres in front of where the ball left RTShek’s hands.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Poppa replied to Roy tannous's discussion AND LOMAX…
"I'll give a shit, you guys should try it, you might actully learn something, well Randolph anyway, trying to teach Frank anything is like saying the Pope isn't catholic."
7 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion No suspensions from the game 🥳
"NRL physio saying roosters have pulled a winger from nsw cup on standby for next week. Tupou seen limping after his third try might be in doubt. "
11 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Roy tannous's discussion AND LOMAX…
"Lomax, is a bloody great player for us, a natural leader in game play.
I think he is trying a touch to hard. He will make the Kangaroo tour which unfortunately means he is not going to have a great rest as he will be on train on squad as soon as our…"
22 minutes ago
HKF replied to Eli Stephens's discussion No suspensions from the game 🥳
"He has really bad technique, he plants his feet early and then has to lean/fall into the tackle in a hug type technique without solid shoulder contact and absolutely no leg strength.  I'm surprised he has managed to make it to first grade with such…"
29 minutes ago
More…