A heap of our players on report.  What do people think each player will get under the curent roll of the dice MRC and Judiciary?

Nothing more needed.  Plenty of incidents out of this match.

Personally amazed that the incident that riled RCG did not even get a penalty.

NRL needs to mature and get some common sense in regards to this stuff.  There is foul play and then there are accidents with contributing circumstances.

 

EE

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • If the refs dont penalise the Tigers player for grubby act then they leave it up to the players to make sure that they are not soft targets

    • Which is why I think Papalli acted the way he did.  That said, still silly stuff that could bite us now.  He has been so good for us.

  • This reply was deleted.
    • What about Moses?  Fine?  That was soft.

      • Moses won't even get a fine in my opinion.

        • Hope you are correct.  Nor should he, it was ridiculous!

          • Agreed. So was the Brooks one, the calls were bad for both sides. The refs were terrible tonight.

            • Horrible call for both sides.  Totally agree. More so, over the rubbish application of high shots and foul play.

            • If there are that many successful captain's challenges, does that not highlight how shite atkins is. How does this dope still have a job.

              • Just shows how many calls were awarded to the incorrect teams pre captains challenge . And what happens to the teams that use one incorrect for these howlers they refs are getting incorrect.  

                I believe each team should get two per half amd if you get one correct you shoud be awarded an extra one .  Captains challenge is the best thing to happen to the game in years , but teams should not be forced to have to accept the wrong calls for a full half if they blow their single challenge on a 50/50 call early in the half . 

              • 💯 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Joel K's discussion Our new signing
"Alamoti is the reason they are letting Jenkins walk i believe? They are prioritising the likes of McLean, Alamoti and the likes. They only had reportedly $350k to offer Jenkins."
4 hours ago
LB replied to Joel K's discussion Our new signing
"Oh of course they have. Wouldn't that be the same for BA then? But you never replied when i asked why Ryles gets a pass on recruitment but BA did not?
And they do not only sign fringe players to get 95% but they front load deals as well. So for…"
4 hours ago
Gucci replied to Joel K's discussion Our new signing
"Another player we can raid Penrith for is Alamoti. Can negotiate from November 1st. Penrith have a lot of players to keep and extend. We could go hard for him. Good defender, kicks, has alittle X factor about him. "
4 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Joel K's discussion Our new signing
"My sources are saying Ryles asked for x y and b, but the people negotiating the contracts couldn't sell water in the Sahara desert so they ended up having to spend on dud players as usual to get to 95% of the total cap"
5 hours ago
More…