A heap of our players on report.  What do people think each player will get under the curent roll of the dice MRC and Judiciary?

Nothing more needed.  Plenty of incidents out of this match.

Personally amazed that the incident that riled RCG did not even get a penalty.

NRL needs to mature and get some common sense in regards to this stuff.  There is foul play and then there are accidents with contributing circumstances.

 

EE

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • If the refs dont penalise the Tigers player for grubby act then they leave it up to the players to make sure that they are not soft targets

    • Which is why I think Papalli acted the way he did.  That said, still silly stuff that could bite us now.  He has been so good for us.

  • This reply was deleted.
    • What about Moses?  Fine?  That was soft.

      • Moses won't even get a fine in my opinion.

        • Hope you are correct.  Nor should he, it was ridiculous!

          • Agreed. So was the Brooks one, the calls were bad for both sides. The refs were terrible tonight.

            • Horrible call for both sides.  Totally agree. More so, over the rubbish application of high shots and foul play.

            • If there are that many successful captain's challenges, does that not highlight how shite atkins is. How does this dope still have a job.

              • Just shows how many calls were awarded to the incorrect teams pre captains challenge . And what happens to the teams that use one incorrect for these howlers they refs are getting incorrect.  

                I believe each team should get two per half amd if you get one correct you shoud be awarded an extra one .  Captains challenge is the best thing to happen to the game in years , but teams should not be forced to have to accept the wrong calls for a full half if they blow their single challenge on a 50/50 call early in the half . 

              • 💯 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

macybrown replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"I'd assume we had our lawyer verifying the correctness of our release contract terms if Lomax had his, and guess if our end doesn't hold up well we need a new lawyer :) but, as far as the clubs concerned I think this is the first time they've…"
7 minutes ago
Axel replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Good point Daz. I was thinking last night that I've never seen ALL the members on this site united and in agreement about an issue related to the club.
All thanks to Zac LOL "
13 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Just posted in this thread Macy if we get through this court case with the W it will restore alot of the negativity I've had around these guys.We've lost some high profile recruitment battles this off season and now we are operating from a position…"
15 minutes ago
macybrown replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Blue Eel i must've been living under a rock as I didn't know he asked for a release in July? Where is this info?  Man, I really liked Lomax but I've been sucked in for awhile there :(
funny thing his management just coming out now and stating that…"
23 minutes ago
More…