A heap of our players on report.  What do people think each player will get under the curent roll of the dice MRC and Judiciary?

Nothing more needed.  Plenty of incidents out of this match.

Personally amazed that the incident that riled RCG did not even get a penalty.

NRL needs to mature and get some common sense in regards to this stuff.  There is foul play and then there are accidents with contributing circumstances.

 

EE

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • If the refs dont penalise the Tigers player for grubby act then they leave it up to the players to make sure that they are not soft targets

    • Which is why I think Papalli acted the way he did.  That said, still silly stuff that could bite us now.  He has been so good for us.

  • This reply was deleted.
    • What about Moses?  Fine?  That was soft.

      • Moses won't even get a fine in my opinion.

        • Hope you are correct.  Nor should he, it was ridiculous!

          • Agreed. So was the Brooks one, the calls were bad for both sides. The refs were terrible tonight.

            • Horrible call for both sides.  Totally agree. More so, over the rubbish application of high shots and foul play.

            • If there are that many successful captain's challenges, does that not highlight how shite atkins is. How does this dope still have a job.

              • Just shows how many calls were awarded to the incorrect teams pre captains challenge . And what happens to the teams that use one incorrect for these howlers they refs are getting incorrect.  

                I believe each team should get two per half amd if you get one correct you shoud be awarded an extra one .  Captains challenge is the best thing to happen to the game in years , but teams should not be forced to have to accept the wrong calls for a full half if they blow their single challenge on a 50/50 call early in the half . 

              • 💯 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Storm either get him this year or not at all, so player swap next year is quite impossible. But I agree I think a swap is hard as Melbourne are that proud in what they are doing they won't have a sense of losing by caving in.
Yeah he ain't sitting…"
5 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"I don't think the eels want to keep Lomax out of the game they are open to sending him to any club who wants him. But the way the storm and Lomax acted trying to sneak around it, I doubt eels want to deal with Melbourne. Ryles seems like a man of…"
6 minutes ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Denan Kemp said, and he is right, Melbourne cannot say no to a player of theirs asking for a release again.
The main thing out of this is Melbourne do not give a flying you know what how people see them in this. If they win the comp this year all…"
11 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"As much as I'd like Lomax to sit out from the nrl for the next 3 years (and he should) realistically that isn't happening. It isn't fair.
That is what this court case is all about, to determine what is fair. So it isn't 100% right or 100% wrong (or…"
19 minutes ago
More…