A heap of our players on report.  What do people think each player will get under the curent roll of the dice MRC and Judiciary?

Nothing more needed.  Plenty of incidents out of this match.

Personally amazed that the incident that riled RCG did not even get a penalty.

NRL needs to mature and get some common sense in regards to this stuff.  There is foul play and then there are accidents with contributing circumstances.

 

EE

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • If the refs dont penalise the Tigers player for grubby act then they leave it up to the players to make sure that they are not soft targets

    • Which is why I think Papalli acted the way he did.  That said, still silly stuff that could bite us now.  He has been so good for us.

  • This reply was deleted.
    • What about Moses?  Fine?  That was soft.

      • Moses won't even get a fine in my opinion.

        • Hope you are correct.  Nor should he, it was ridiculous!

          • Agreed. So was the Brooks one, the calls were bad for both sides. The refs were terrible tonight.

            • Horrible call for both sides.  Totally agree. More so, over the rubbish application of high shots and foul play.

            • If there are that many successful captain's challenges, does that not highlight how shite atkins is. How does this dope still have a job.

              • Just shows how many calls were awarded to the incorrect teams pre captains challenge . And what happens to the teams that use one incorrect for these howlers they refs are getting incorrect.  

                I believe each team should get two per half amd if you get one correct you shoud be awarded an extra one .  Captains challenge is the best thing to happen to the game in years , but teams should not be forced to have to accept the wrong calls for a full half if they blow their single challenge on a 50/50 call early in the half . 

              • 💯 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Eelovution replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Will. Yes you are corect in that Galvin was under contract when the Eels approached him. However the circumstances were different and the Eels approach was totally legal. At that time Richardson-Tigers CEO- had offered Galvin a large increse in…"
1 minute ago
will replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Just playing devil's advocate here,  but wasn't Galvin still under contract with the tigers when Parra was trying to recruit him?
We are arguing that there is one rule for the storm and one rule us, but really we do it too"
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"LB, Here's the 1EE top 20 most viewed


Brett Finch on Matty Johns podcast (Fish, 2019)


Signing news (PouPou, 2019)


The Parramatta GOAT (Super, 2020)


Some big rumours circulating (Chief, 2025)


Dylan Brown open to offers (Super, 2025)


Dylan…"
4 hours ago
Kurupt - 1 Year Cuck replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Probably 2009 Melbourne Under Bellamy Saga"
4 hours ago
More…