A heap of our players on report.  What do people think each player will get under the curent roll of the dice MRC and Judiciary?

Nothing more needed.  Plenty of incidents out of this match.

Personally amazed that the incident that riled RCG did not even get a penalty.

NRL needs to mature and get some common sense in regards to this stuff.  There is foul play and then there are accidents with contributing circumstances.

 

EE

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • If the refs dont penalise the Tigers player for grubby act then they leave it up to the players to make sure that they are not soft targets

    • Which is why I think Papalli acted the way he did.  That said, still silly stuff that could bite us now.  He has been so good for us.

  • This reply was deleted.
    • What about Moses?  Fine?  That was soft.

      • Moses won't even get a fine in my opinion.

        • Hope you are correct.  Nor should he, it was ridiculous!

          • Agreed. So was the Brooks one, the calls were bad for both sides. The refs were terrible tonight.

            • Horrible call for both sides.  Totally agree. More so, over the rubbish application of high shots and foul play.

            • If there are that many successful captain's challenges, does that not highlight how shite atkins is. How does this dope still have a job.

              • Just shows how many calls were awarded to the incorrect teams pre captains challenge . And what happens to the teams that use one incorrect for these howlers they refs are getting incorrect.  

                I believe each team should get two per half amd if you get one correct you shoud be awarded an extra one .  Captains challenge is the best thing to happen to the game in years , but teams should not be forced to have to accept the wrong calls for a full half if they blow their single challenge on a 50/50 call early in the half . 

              • 💯 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Clintorian, I'd be flabbergasted if this isn't casually swept under the rug.
Regardless of outcomes, it makes me smile we are playing a different game —pulling the rug away with the power of the subpoena.
Legal muscle and daylight. If you can't beat…"
12 minutes ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Im thinking some of the savvy, experienced and high performing operators around the game will see this as an opportunity to pull a double whammy on their rival. Think about the possibility presenting itself to Penrith, Roosters, Sharks, Bulldogs and…"
26 minutes ago
Longfin Eel replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"This is pretty funny really. The fact that Melbourne just assumed this would be OK suggests they have done similar things before and not been pinged for it by the salary cap auditors. No doubt the NRL sweeps under the carpet issues that are found…"
29 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Wow... HOE, this is what I was looking for as I wasn't sure how Storm could be forced to pay for his legal bills.
THIS IS HUGE!
 "
35 minutes ago
More…