If he challenges and fail it's 3 weeks
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Hi Bup,
Native Title land is not freehold. There is no right to buy and sell. It means Aboriginal people can use the land for traditional purposes e.g. throwing boomerangs etc. They also have input to how it is maintained etc. If you get the chance…"
Native Title land is not freehold. There is no right to buy and sell. It means Aboriginal people can use the land for traditional purposes e.g. throwing boomerangs etc. They also have input to how it is maintained etc. If you get the chance…"
"Camel 🐪 hair is very erotic . Have you seen middle eastern women 😉"
Replies
Seems OTT
Him leaving the air makes everything look 10x worse than it was
I think there's scope to challenge this. He clearly left the ground to avoid Dylan Browns legs.
We only verse tigers in the second week so there is no point risking the suspension going into the dogs game.
He missed the tigers game last year and we lost
Less to do with Paulos absence and more to do with Brown and Moses being outplayed by Brooks and Hastings. Moses choked big time.
These are the games we should win that scare me big time. You'd like to think we've progressed this attitude where we feel entitled to win before a ball is kicked , but what we've seen so far this year nothing seems to have changed. Let's hope we've had an attitude adjustment .
i'm not unhappy with kaufusi decision, save for it being a bit harsh on this occasion, but what goes around, comes around - remember how he got off 3 times last year for what most would get done for?
He played for Melbourne then, that's different.
Spot on
When was the last time an eels player was successful at the judiciary
I think 2 weeks is a favourable result considering his history with the judiciary.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
of 4 Next