Parra's salary cap??

 

Unless we have paid over the odds for the pensioners bought this year, we surely must be under the salary cap this year and by a huge margin.(Cayless, Mateo, Inu, Keating all gone)

 

Which leads to to the question/statement, have we done something to bring forward  the payment for some players so we have a bigger war chest next year?

 

Is this possible under salary cap rules?

 

 If Hayne is on $400,000 per year can we pay him $500,000 this year and pocket the difference in 2012?

 

Is anyone aware of this occurring?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • No that can't be done, but if we are $600000 under this year when you take upgrades and back ended deals for next year into account we should still have $400000-$500000 to spend on 1 quality player next season.

    I would guess the reason we are so far under this year is because we have someone coming next season and there was no-one who would sign a 1year contract to fill this year if you know what i mean.

  • hayne deserves $100,000 a year by the way hes playing
  • :) 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Nightmare Off-Season replied to Cʜɪᴇғ -'s discussion Big News On Lomax
"The Panthers just re-signed / about to re-sign May on 500k per season, and have re-signed Tago on 750k (reportedly) at centre. Our 3 centres probably don't reach 750k combined. 
So while they've developed great wingers as you mentioned, they've also…"
1 hour ago
MeelK replied to Cʜɪᴇғ -'s discussion Big News On Lomax
"I'd sign for that."
6 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғ -'s discussion Big News On Lomax
"Look i think it is more than just being put on the Wing. I think Flanno is a reason. Wanting to play semi's is another.
I think a move away will be an awakening for Lomax. He was on with Fltech and Hindy with Lawrie in 2022 and he mimicked Griffin.…"
7 hours ago
AlShaw replied to Cʜɪᴇғ -'s discussion Big News On Lomax
"600k is OK for the right winger. The Panthers sets are built on what their back 3 do on tackle one. The more momentum at the start of a set the more expansive a team can play but if our back three are getting smashed on tackle one and two it puts…"
8 hours ago
More…