You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"The NRL are involved because Melbourne got them involved with threats of penalities if Parra didnt comply"
"In return for lomax we should ask for the storm to buy all our Top 30 a boat. The boys can then rip up Parra River with donuts"
"We should. He'll be out of puff and sorts. Target him all game long."
"Lomax isnt on our cap, hes was released and cap space freed. his breaking the condition of his release, we should not be settling for a mid level player unless its multiple players.
if we were smart he would not be playing rd1 against us either. "
if we were smart he would not be playing rd1 against us either. "
Replies
I'm unsure if the article suggests this was not listed in the figures of the financial report, or just expects the club to put it in writing in an address to members.
- Not mentioning it, because you are committed to straightening things out and avoiding it? Unsure. Do you then list figures for every possible thing that may or may not go wrong?
The bashing continues. I don't like the very obvious agenda here but you can't defend the club. It shows there is just no way that Sharp can continue on while there are people hellbent on bringing him down. Sharp has to go.
Thank you
What the fuck do you know. As a member of the club for years we are all entitled to our say.
Where is the transparency? It's like you post with a proverbial incumbents testicle stuck in your throat.
Maybe you should stay on your feet during those fans council meetings