Issaia Papalili, The Iceman, Teen Wolf, we all knew that he would be a good signing, but did anyone think he would be one of our top 3 players week in week out ?

Now I've noticed that each time Matterson is named, Papalili is also named as a bench reserve. Now that was fair enough for the opening few rounds, but Papalili has more than succeeded as an 80 minute non stop bulldozing back rower, & there's no way Brad Arthur can ignore Isaac's efforts and again drop him in favor of Shaun Lane or Matterson in my opinion.

In Matterson's case, he's a great wide defender who is pretty much a bodyguard to moses, and also a good ball player. 

Shaun Lane has picked up his game of late, but its nowhere near the quality of Papalili's efforts.

Should Papalili' be dropped to the bench once again, or should he be cemented in as our starting back rower ??

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • He can't be left out of the starting team simple as that 

  • Based on his current form, age, ability and potential he should be the starting backrower. Also considering the current (what appears to be chronic) concussion issues with Matterson I would imagine Matterson's return to the Eels maybe risky business. In the interest of common sense and Matterson's health and well being I would suggest that Matterson either seeks an early retirement or does some other role in Rugby League. Lane has definitely improved and he's a quality player despite what others may think. So in my opinion Lane still deserves to be in the 17 but so does Papali'i. So, Perhaps Matterson might be the player missing out.

  • I'm pretty sure BA has a long term plan for papi I suspect he will be the 13 moving forward with Brown moving on

  • I think he's too good not to be starting. His two tries this weekend we're top class back rower's lines.  

    Put lane onto the bench as a middle.

  • It's a nice problem to have but I wouldn't lose any sleep here. It's a very long season and we'll need all our best players throughout the year. In the unlikely event that we have our very best 17 all fit and available for selection then we can worry about whether Papa starts. 

  • First of all, who said he will be dropped?  Secondly, what do you think you will actually achieve by this?  Are you kidding yourself , that you think this site or any other influences B.A, the team or the Club? Petition, really?  Were you one of those special people that protested outside the Club a few years back.  How about, " I don't think Papalii should be dropped, he has earned his spot"?  Not one of your best Chiefy.

    • I took out the petition header before you put your post in EE.  I've made it more of an opinion blog.

      You were correct in calling  that out. I was more thinking about rewarding Issaia for his great efforts.

      • Awesome Chiefy.  Much better and now makes a whole heap of sense.

    • This reply was deleted.
      • No it wasn't Mack, not when it was first posted it came witha heading for a Petition that Papalii not be dropped.  Chiefy has changed it, which is why it is now correctly an opinion blog.  Not intended as aggressive.  I just though the original post which has now been amended was ridiculous.

  • This reply was deleted.
    • I think once Marata is released from the centers, he may go back to the bench which will give more opportunity to start Papalili.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to LB's discussion The draw idea with 20 teams and the issues around it. (LONG BLOG)
"No it is relevant. You have a weaker conference, average teams get more points against much weaker teams. If you have a team with more wins but the other team gets higher seed or makes finals due to bonus wins that's not fair. They get the bonus…"
2 minutes ago
Slippery. replied to LB's discussion The draw idea with 20 teams and the issues around it. (LONG BLOG)

 Having 1 conference stronger than another would matter at all. The extra points for conference wins are only available in your own conference, therefore the strength or weakness of your conference is irrelevant. The downside I see with the…"
16 minutes ago
LB replied to LB's discussion The draw idea with 20 teams and the issues around it. (LONG BLOG)
"Ok but firstly SL clubs would get annoyed those players can't stay. Players get annoyed they get shafted for NRL players. For 3 weeks not worth the while to get hurt. Paid extra money yet the game loses money with less product as stated before.…"
32 minutes ago
LB replied to LB's discussion The draw idea with 20 teams and the issues around it. (LONG BLOG)
"The more points is not fair as not both conferences are the same in quality. What if one conference is more difficult than the other? Plus the 3 higher ranked doesn't solve the issue of worse teams still getting in over better teams simply due to…"
59 minutes ago
More…