Oregon Kaufusi

" It's reported Oregon Kaufusi has not activated his player option with the Sharks for the 2025 season and is therefore a free-agent and able to sign with rival clubs. "  - Fox Sports

Should we go for him?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Why not just keep Reg?

    • He doesn't want to stay, fair dinkum....not happy with 2 years extension 

      • Ok didnt know that we offered a two year extension on top of 25 and he said no ?  interesting ....

    • Again, if Reg was that big a loss how have other teams baulked at his length demands? All the clubs seem to agree with where we are, he is good but ageing and declining. He wanted 3 years, we wanted his coin to bring in more depth and avoid relying on Ron Massey players again. 

      In a 5 year stretch you will get more value out of Kaufusi than RCG, since RCG will retire soon and Kaufusi would be starting all those 5 years.

      • Kaufusi is not good enough, never got past potential....would not want these type of players back!

        Just shows how dumb Cronulla were in paying him big money.

    • Reg is 31 and past his best.

      Oregon still has his best years ahead of him

      I like it.

  • 26yrs old. probbaly same rate. I would

    • Yeah adnan, he ain't going to demand much more than the roughly $400k he is on at Cronulla right now.

  • That prop at manly who went nuts in new York I think is free . He seems settled now and cheap  .lodge

    • Too many injuries and is hitting 30. We tried Lodge in 2019, that time when we were moving on Mannah and looking for a replacement, but he declined to stay in Brisbane, we gave him a nice deal. We then moved to Welch, then RCG after Welch's injury.

      Lodge i would say is not the right choice for us, nothing to do with personality, more so where he is in his footy career.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Mark O'neill out - Shane Richardson in
"The consequences of that is does Shane Richardson want to be the head of football. If he does then that question becomes relevant! The best person becomes only relevant when considering who is available......or who you would ask to be available.
The…"
6 minutes ago
LB replied to LB's discussion 1eE Modern day Eels team: Second-row
"I though Ma'u and McCracken would be the favorites "
6 minutes ago
Nitram replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kemp: Eels vs Storm R1 refereeing was "really, really bad...disgraceful"
"Obviously the ref either;
A) failured and cant do his job, or
B) was asked to apply the blow torch (hahah no chance, go back to A).
BUT, I watched the manly/canberra game and the ref was killing the raiders as well (at the start). The difference was…"
11 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Mark O'neill out - Shane Richardson in
"Yes he is an executive director. Not elected from the board, he could be replaced at any time, i.e not an elected director."
12 minutes ago
More…