Eels Blogs

On the line.

Posted by Luked on May 11, 2018 at 9:50pm
The commentators said foot on the line is deemed inside? Am I missing something? I thought his foot was on the line? 20m restart?I clap, stand up, go get a beer, only to come back to a line drop out and dogs score.Am I wrong?
Views: 30

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

★
★
★
★
★
Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –
Follow

Replies

  • Frankie savage May 11, 2018 at 9:52pm
    No line is in goal 20m restart. But the bunker can’t over turn decisions I guess
    • ParraTime > Frankie savage May 11, 2018 at 9:52pm
      They reviewed it and deemed it drop out
    • Luked > Frankie savage May 11, 2018 at 9:52pm
      What are they there for then? I'm really not understanding this.
    • Frankie savage > Frankie savage May 11, 2018 at 9:55pm
      Correct they did review it. But I don’t think I’ve ever seen the bunker over turn a decision before. I’d prefer the old benifit of the doubt rule like the old days. All this technological with the bunker and can’t use it. They replay clear decision on the big screen for all the fans to see the ref was wrong and still can’t over turn the reff wtf.
    • Luked > Frankie savage May 11, 2018 at 9:57pm
      Exactly! What is the bunker there for if they can't rule on, what I think was, a 100% clear cut ruling. His foot was on the line... No questions asked.
    • Frankie savage > Frankie savage May 11, 2018 at 10:00pm
      The bunkers there to piss fans of
    • Rise of an empire > Frankie savage May 11, 2018 at 10:14pm
      The bunker used to overturn decisions like that all the time, then they limited what they could interfere with
  • iamnot May 11, 2018 at 9:52pm
    Ashley Klein was the lead ref. Enough said
  • Joseph May 11, 2018 at 9:52pm
    So many calls went the dogs try. Our no try call was BS. League is rigged
    • Wile E. Coyote > Joseph May 11, 2018 at 9:53pm

      All dogs tries and final penalty off referring mistakes

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"They have never been in a position of not getting what they want. They said when first started Ryles should just tell the board to let him go as they let him go, despite not letting him touch Storm players for 12 months, they also said the Sydney…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Yeah they have backs but also how often do they get Origin talent?"
1 hour ago
Troy Wade replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"I'm sick of all the attention this bloke is getting. Go play bush footy for 3 years. End of story. You made your bed - now sleep on it..The NRL and the Storm can well and truely go get f....."
2 hours ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Only reason I think he remains at the club is on a minimum wage deal to have someone integrated in the culture available as an experienced head in NSW cup to help steer the team around. I agree he is not going to be a priority signing and he hasn't…"
2 hours ago
More…

Eels blogs

Social Blogs