Eels Blogs

Replies

• 

  EelsAgeMe May 26, 2018 at 8:37am

  Mate, In all honesty there is nothing sinister about it. Do you really think a ref would hi-five a player on national television if he was doing dodgy shit?
  • 

    Kenny was the King > EelsAgeMe May 26, 2018 at 5:37pm

    Do you really think cricketers would sandpaper a ball on international TV??? Stupid people do stupid things!
• 

  the eggman May 26, 2018 at 8:46am

  I'm pretty sure if you slow it right down as their hands meet you can see a wad of cash being exchanged.
• 

  Peter Kay May 26, 2018 at 9:09am

  ...and please explain the difference between the last pass to Cotric in the Raiders game for their last try, that let them win that game and the last pass to Bevan in our game called forward that meant we lost the game.
  The difference is that the Raiders pass looked forward out of the hand and ours did not. It doesn't matter that people say we didn't deserve to win. As Clint Eastwood once said, " deserves" got nothing to do with it.
  • 

    Rise of an empire > Peter Kay May 26, 2018 at 9:41am

    I think both passes were forward
• 

  Mac5733 May 26, 2018 at 11:48am

  24th minute of the game???? I didn’t see a penalty at all.
• 

  Tin Tim May 26, 2018 at 1:23pm

  Ref have huge say on who wins. While coaches & players cop the brunt, the supporters, that most watch every game can clearly see how some refs sway to wards teams or players. Some bad decisions have placed us in this position, you can say we ain't playing good enough. Yes we ain't, it is why we need our share of 50/50 calls. Is the game corrupt? Hope not!!
• 

  The Ape May 26, 2018 at 4:28pm

  https://streamable.com/ubirs
  • 

    Chocolate Frog ♥ Ms Peppers Mint > The Ape May 26, 2018 at 9:55pm

    Blatant and sinister - just how corrupt NRL is. We really won this game - Jennings & French incidents were tries.  
  • 

    colin hussey > The Ape May 26, 2018 at 10:17pm

    That is very obvious as Klunk puts his hand out towards the donkies player and they seem to touch, would need to see that from a different angle to be sure, does not look good at all. But nothing will happen anyway.  Klunk should never referee again, problem might be that other refs may not like what they see but will defend their own so even if something happens to Klunk then the eels will be held responsible and get the short shaft again.