Eels Blogs

NRL financial results

Posted by JT on February 14, 2017 at 12:36pm

I read Roy Masters article in the SMH this morning outlining the NRL's $2.6M loss for 2016 despite a improved non-broadcast income of $144.2M. Our old mate Nick Tabakoff reports a "windfall" of $140M to the NRL due to non-broadcast revenue but no mention of the $2.6M loss.

Has the daily terror only reported part of the whole story to suit their agenda and master. Doesn't sound like them I must be reading too much into it....

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

★

Votes: 0

Email me when people reply –

Replies

RazorRam0n February 14, 2017 at 12:51pm

yeah i few interesting things i took from the numbers

1. we're not that far off from the afl...the gap is simply memberships and football revenue vs club money not on the books = pokies.

2. the arlc expenses aren't as much as whinging phil gould makes it out to be. especially considering the new revenue generated they can justify spending it on.
RazorRam0n February 14, 2017 at 2:33pm

Yes that's football club related revenue, pokies is not which afl clubs don't have, learn to read

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Cooper Cronk: On the Parramatta Eels, Pezet, Lomax and Recruitment

"HFK, Fair point. Sure, we could. But balancing incoming youth with experience is almost a perennial issue. A constant cycle. It never really goes away. At least not for too long. "