Nrl back flip on eels strange

Todd Greenberg n his offsider nrl integrity unit stated 48 hours ago parra will not play for points untill 5 directors are gone n eels under salary cap for 2016, well a load of shit . Parra get ex nrl auditor Ian sherburt n he states nrl got there figures wrong . Apparently nrl put years ago tpas into 2016 cap, which is a breach by the nrl, also sharp n cronies take nrl to court win very strange , u cannot go to Supreme Court with out a good case n evidence for the judge to give u a win. I think the nrl as gone of to quick . Also Todd Greenberg gave advice to ex parra Ceo Scott Seward on how to do the salary cap, to me that's a conflict of interest , u can't give advice n then be the executioner. I'm not saying our club is clean but it's nowhere in the way the nrl stated. Greenberg said they gave parra a 4 point suspended penalty , in my eyes a suspended penalty is not in concrete. That mean if we were rortting the cap for the last 5?years straight surely the nrl would've stepped in years ago, they let it go for 5 years n then go hard , n now backflip . Bullshit . Nrl n todd Greenberg have to be held accountable for these accusations. Very strange.go parra.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • They haven't won in court lol we cheated mate!! The NRL has just penalised wrong and making us out worse then what we are it seems to be anyway
    • Est 88 every year there are clubs that are over the cap and they just pay the fine and move on.We had a 500 k fine last year.The NRL cannot make us out to be worse than what we really are.
    • We cheated in the fact that TPA's were determined by the club big no no! Yes I agree we aren't the only club that do it but people need to realise that yes we did! End of
    • Agree Mondo... They have good legal advice that gives us bigger chance to fight off Adolf Greenburg
  • Strange
  • Sorry, but it is not that strange at all. It merely confirms what was inferred from the actions of both the NRL and the Parramatta Board members. It was a decision that they said was preliminary yet had nothing but "final" about it. 

    You got a hint when after a few days of demands to Go Now or Else (and media buddies expressing outrage that they didn't just go), someone whispered in the NRL ears (hopefully some of the expensive legal advisers they should have) that they were actually in the Supreme Court on Friday and would be tested on "preliminary findings".

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

ParramAddict replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Matterson’s back @ training today. What now.
"Lets see what excuse he comes up with why he can't play against the Storms in Round 1, apart from just not being picked in the 17"
3 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Matterson’s back @ training today. What now.
"If you are going to do that better off just keeping him in Cup as a break glass option. Unless he is that much of a cancer and that negative to the squad that he needs to go."
3 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Matterson’s back @ training today. What now.
"He's fine, just feel we should get a younger Winger. Many saying he's a goal kicker, ummm Moses is too and is pretty much the same in percentage. "
3 hours ago
KENDOZA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Matterson’s back @ training today. What now.
"Someone mentioned on social media we may get jesse arthurs"
3 hours ago
More…