Nathaniel Roache

Did we re-sign him? Very talanted but luckless poor bugger. Would be on absolute minimum wage.

Or is BA clearing the decks, just waiting to part the sea again at the first opportunity?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Thought he was released?

  • That was bruising on his knees, that was BA looking after the next in line....

  • Apparently he dislocated his shoulder trying to sign a new contract.

  • Injured, out for the season I believe. And under NRL rules I believe the Eels can continue paying him without counting him under the cap.

    • That's interesting Super, I am glad we are perservering with him because he is a talent.....what was the injury?

    • He is talented and very unlucky. Out for this season? Is he actually still on our roster? No mention of him. Could be useful in 23.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Stevo replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"The NRL are involved because Melbourne got them involved with threats of penalities if Parra didnt comply"
4 hours ago
Parra fan on The Hill replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"In return for lomax we should ask for the storm to buy all our Top 30 a boat. The boys can then rip up Parra River with donuts"
5 hours ago
Parra fan on The Hill replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"We should. He'll be out of puff and sorts. Target him all game long."
5 hours ago
Blaze replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"Lomax isnt on our cap, hes was released and cap space freed. his breaking the condition of his release, we should not be settling for a mid level player unless its multiple players.
if we were smart he would not be playing rd1 against us either. "
6 hours ago
More…