Nathaniel Roache

Did we re-sign him? Very talanted but luckless poor bugger. Would be on absolute minimum wage.

Or is BA clearing the decks, just waiting to part the sea again at the first opportunity?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Thought he was released?

  • That was bruising on his knees, that was BA looking after the next in line....

  • Apparently he dislocated his shoulder trying to sign a new contract.

  • Injured, out for the season I believe. And under NRL rules I believe the Eels can continue paying him without counting him under the cap.

    • That's interesting Super, I am glad we are perservering with him because he is a talent.....what was the injury?

    • He is talented and very unlucky. Out for this season? Is he actually still on our roster? No mention of him. Could be useful in 23.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Though Hannay might like the experience of Matto. Move Tino to Prop and Matto at Lock. Plus Matto is off-contract, bloke will perform to get one more deal."
6 minutes ago
LB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"As is always the case. Human nature. There is a chance that Melbourne just drop off."
8 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Poppa's discussion Shark Attack..... Moses told to be wary of the surf!
""
13 minutes ago
Parraborn1 replied to Johnny Suede's discussion What player each NRL club would need to cough-up to snare Lomax
"I'd argue that nobody wants Lomax except for Melbourne who are desperate for short-term acquisitions. "
43 minutes ago
More…