Did we re-sign him? Very talanted but luckless poor bugger. Would be on absolute minimum wage.
Or is BA clearing the decks, just waiting to part the sea again at the first opportunity?
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Also interesting to see that it's possibly the Storm who initiated this framing of "best to keep Lomax in game". V'Landys then repeating that framing, which reversed his previous stance that no player is irreplaceable, definitely suggests the NRL…"
"We now know why the Storm and NRL are so keen to wrap this up quickly. It's showing that there is an understanding between the big clubs and the NRL that you can bully perceived smaller clubs into decisions. I want the Storm added to this case. Then…"
"Is it the Eels who have to sue the Storm to force them into the case (activating discovery provisions) or can the Judge independent view the Storm inducing a breach of contract as grounds to force the Storm to join the case?"
"Let's get through the Supreme Court case first, then sue them for inducement to breach a contract. Where is BM when ya need him?"
Replies
Thought he was released?
That was bruising on his knees, that was BA looking after the next in line....
Apparently he dislocated his shoulder trying to sign a new contract.
Injured, out for the season I believe. And under NRL rules I believe the Eels can continue paying him without counting him under the cap.
That's interesting Super, I am glad we are perservering with him because he is a talent.....what was the injury?
He is talented and very unlucky. Out for this season? Is he actually still on our roster? No mention of him. Could be useful in 23.