You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"1 both
2 souths ( the new roosters, they seem to be the NRL favorites with no salary cap )
3 over rated Mitchell
4 will find out when they debut
5 no would wait till the end of season and see how we go
6 8th
"
2 souths ( the new roosters, they seem to be the NRL favorites with no salary cap )
3 over rated Mitchell
4 will find out when they debut
5 no would wait till the end of season and see how we go
6 8th
"
"1 Gutherson - cant stand him
2. Dragons 4 spoon
3. Gutherson most disliked
4. T Brown debutant
5. Absolutely yes. Sign Ryles until 2031
6. 7th
7🤠 later i will"
2. Dragons 4 spoon
3. Gutherson most disliked
4. T Brown debutant
5. Absolutely yes. Sign Ryles until 2031
6. 7th
7🤠 later i will"
"1. Gutherson
2. Bulldogs
3. Lomax has been recently promoted to my "most hated", because fuck that guy
4. T-bro
5. Not stressed about Ryles contract. If he wants to go he will find a way. I think he plans on staying but you never know. R360…"
2. Bulldogs
3. Lomax has been recently promoted to my "most hated", because fuck that guy
4. T-bro
5. Not stressed about Ryles contract. If he wants to go he will find a way. I think he plans on staying but you never know. R360…"
"1) I'd rather the Dragons go down. Fuck them and Rod Reddy and their dirty tactics in the 1977 GF with their dirty ref.
2)Storm or Panthers. Both cheating cunts.
3) Jerome Luay. Very punchable.
4)Teancum Brown. If he works hard he'll play rep footy…"
2)Storm or Panthers. Both cheating cunts.
3) Jerome Luay. Very punchable.
4)Teancum Brown. If he works hard he'll play rep footy…"
Replies
well done mate , they need further letters from all the decent eel supporters..
agree leave foran alone , the 3 are shitheads from the tele...
Nicely composed letter to the excuse for a newspaper Brett.
That needed to be said.
Good Morning Rebecca
I have just read your article in relation to Kieran Foran. I am happy to say I am a Parramatta fan, but please do not take this that my comments are biased.
I must say I was shocked beyond belief to read what you have reported and it has left me scratching my head as to why someone in the news would think this was worth reporting? To report on someone's personal spending (regardless of what it is spent on) is just not news. However you have felt the need to not only report on it but twist it around his recent personal issues. So I must ask what is your point here?
From your article I can only presume you are trying to drag Kieran Foran down even further than where he is at the moment. And again I ask what is your point of this. Do you wish to cause him further harm, so you have another story to write? Imagine the headlines you could come up with if Kieran slipped further into the dark world of depression.
Comments on social media are definitely supportive of my theory that this is not news, with many commenting "who cares, it's his money" and "leave him alone this is not news". So again I ask what is your point to the article? You seem to have missed the mark with your audience on this one.
I also ask if you have even suffered any type of depression before, or have know anyone who has? Surely if you have you would realise what damage such a report could cause and would have thought twice about putting this to print. I can only hope that Kieran Foran does not read your article or chooses to ignore it. I would hate to think how he would take your article given his current emotional state. But again maybe that is what you are trying to achieve in writing such an article.
You have shown little repect or common sense in your decision to print this article. Based on this and your willingness to kick a person when they are down, I will certainly not be reading any of your stories/articles/posts in the future.
The way the DT reports on Parramatta is almost in-line with the smear campaigns they put out on the Labor party.
Just die already Rupert.
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next