Munster cleared for kicking Manu

Munster has been cleared for foul play in the GF. Absolute disgrace. I thought the ruling on an action was irrespective of the outcome / injury caused by it. Two ridiculous decisions (Slater’s shoulder charge) in the space of a week.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Astounding outrageous and mind blowing!! Someone posted a blog earlier about ‘How to fix the Nrl’ ... fix up inconsistencies like this is a great place to start. Wonder why the games fans are turning away?.

    if this isn’t bringing the game into disrepute htf can anything else be considered to be doing so?

  • thought it was worth a record spell. The game went to the world to see! 

  • Wtf bs nrl are a joke drity Melbourne player getting of again 

  • Just a harmless nudge. More damage to Munster’s  shoe then the other blokes melon. 

    • It's the intent which needs to be dealt with. The frustration of being losers needs to be a humbling experience. He should have got a month at least.
      • Other bloke was taking a nap. Munster just reminded him that the game was still on. Storm in a teacup 

        • You dope. Saying that you’ve probably coped a few kicks to the head ahye son?? Lol.

          • bbq sauce with those chips please 

  • Imagine explaining this decision when trying to convince your wife your son should play league. Thanks nrl now I'm gonna have to lie to the wife and tell her he got three months.

    If NRL players are allowed to kick players in the back of the head imagine what will happen in lower grades. Disgraceful...
  • Munster got just under $2000 fine I heard which is similar to other striking charges.

    What happened to Curtis Scott though as friend accused him of throwing 3 or 4 punches but no follow up during game or afterwards.

    He has form as well as he was the one who smacked Dylan Walker earlier in the year.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Hoey, That's an excellent point re Crawley.....one of the side benefits of these issues is seeing how the media is manipulated by their masters......its not just sugar you get when sqeezing cane, there is the side benefit of the Rum! Lol
 "
1 minute ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Thanks, Kurupt. It's a fascinating case. The timeline of public / media releases in the footnotes is also an interesting study of framing public narratives."
9 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Thanks, Mitchy. 
It's interesting, Crawley was emphatic on Feb 12 in backing the Eels, labelling Lomax’s case “complete nonsense.”
Since then, there’s been no follow-up column on Lomax despite significant reported developments, including messages…"
11 minutes ago
Muttman replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"I didn't see the entire interview. Did he really say he thought $300k was a great deal? "
19 minutes ago
More…