http://www.nrl.com/mitch-allgood-cops-two-week-ban/tabid/10874/newsid/79002/default.aspx
if someone could edit this with the blog much appreciated
http://www.nrl.com/mitch-allgood-cops-two-week-ban/tabid/10874/newsid/79002/default.aspx
if someone could edit this with the blog much appreciated
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
Replies
Mitch is turning out to be as dopey as Darcey on the park, i love aggression, but no point doing stupid shit that gets you banned when your team needs you, he was over pumped in that tackle and lost his cool, i think 1 or 2 weeks is fair for that.
Snake he can't help it if he is strong and maybe a touch p'd off lol.
There was a similar albeit not as spectacular one in the roosters v raiders (can't remember who), not even a penalty.
I agree with you. Lussick and Allgood need to control their aggro. They need to play smarter.
Tackle wasn't as bad as Reynolds was.
Challenge. A precedent has been set with Bird and Reynolds.
This is ridiculous. It was a nothing tackle. He let him down in the end. Its very poor double standards if Bird has his charge downgraded, so as to only miss 1 SOO game and Reynolds gets NOTHING, to miss no games!? Mitch's tackle was basically the same, possibly not as bad as Reynolds one FFS.
The article also said something about the charge was based on the last 2 years of his judiciary record?! WTF? why 2 years, it should only be the past 12 months surely?
That is what any decent administration would do --Challenge. But our do nothing administration, if following precedent, will do sweet fanny adams. They never back their own players. They are too bloody weak. Now that our edifice is burning to the ground is the time for some backbone and some guts and take them on. If you don`t know how talk to Greenburge he knows all about it. He got Reynolds off. You have a duty of care for the Eels players. Apply it.
He had 80 carry over points from similar tackles, he was always going to get hammered.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next