A vote of 171 to 101.
Max's Motion defeated once again.
When will the Pelicans ever learn. Some serious Muppets voiced some serious CONSPIRACY THEORY'S. Wow.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"I hear what you are saying, and you are right, but that sounds like what we said in the early 90s when we never expected to come close to winning games. As a club we do need to be so much better than what has been dished up this season. There has…"
"Both can't have a stint. I don't think either need a long term stint. The more they play the better they'll be. I wouldn't say Smith is having 2nd year syndrome as much as that sternum injury would have limited him a lot."
"To be honest, Smith and Dasilva need a stint. Especially Dasilva. Has all the talent in the world but needs to pick his timing comes with age and just crafting at it. Smith needs a stint , he just havinf a second year syndrome."
"Listening to Ryles' presser, he talked about the Hooking position. He mentioned Edwards was brought to the club as he can play dummy half as well as in the middle. But he also said Edwards allows Hookers to develop and play more mins in cup. So does…"
Replies
Another waisted night. Dragged myself out of bed with the flu to be there as I felt it would be the last time. Wrong again.
Let me guess ?
Andrew Eagleston
Speaking of Andrew, it wasn’t a complete waste of time. I enjoyed hearing Max say after andrew spoke, that it was the worst dribble he had ever heard or something to that effect. Max also told andrew instead of threatening legal action, to either do it or go away. Made Andrew look like a real goose deservedly.
Forget the coach, board, CEO. This is the real reason Parra will forever underachieve
Agreed. The members (collectively) have shown they are incapable of fixing this issue. We can't go on forever like this. Don't they understand that Max will just continue on as Administrator and the club will continue to have to pay him his fees?
I thought so too. I hope the Government now step in and ram home these reforms.
The big issue is that Clubs NSW will strongly oppose any such intervention, as it will create a very serious precedent. Technically it could be done, and with the NSW state election done, it might be a little more likely, but if the only sticking point is the election or appointment of the initial board, and I believe that is the only sticking point now, it would seem unlikely that ILGA will intervene.
The point is now we have to go down on Monday 37th May and vote to stop a factional takeover.
The next step is to vote down the 27 May proposal, then pressure the State Govt to just ram the new constitution home. I'm so sick of this. The factional infighting has prevented moving us forward, the members are incapable of coming to an agreement. We are left with no other option than to have State Gov involvement.
They’ll need 75% in favour too
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next