Eels Blogs

Match review committee explain their desicions...

Posted by Gower Power on March 24, 2015 at 12:51am

How did I not know about this sooner? The NRL match review committee are making this short videos where they explain some of their decisions. They're posted on the official NRL Facebook page, but I haven't been able to find them anywhere else, such as the NRL website (not that I looked that hard).

I've just watched the video for week 3. I haven't yet watched the videos for weeks 1 and 2 yet... I just couldn't wait to post it so everyone else here knows! The videos and their explanations are an absolute joke! They seem to make random calls like tossing a coin... Ah, that dangerous tackle from Greg Bird was not intentional. Because he's a good and fair player... Duh....

https://www.facebook.com/nrl?fref=ts

Views: 0

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

★
★
★
★
★
Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –
Follow

Replies

  • MATTYICE March 24, 2015 at 8:20am
    Have they explained the difference between the tackle on Greg inglis in rd3 and the tackle on JT in rd2 looked identical to me
  • macybrown March 24, 2015 at 9:33am

    Thanks for posting this although it just mystifying at how they come up with this total BS.

    SHAME on you Michael Buettner!!!

    Can anyone that believes Jnr's tackle deserved even a few weeks, please explain the difference as to why Birds tackle was let off scott free...because these MRC turkey's have more or less explained that Bird's tackle was accidental and not intentional.

    Ridiculous as it sounds, in the end Jnr was penalised for being too strong he wrapped him up ball and all in a legit way and he did not put any undue pressure on his head and head no intent...just like they state here in the circumstances as for the  reason Birds was dismissed.

     

  • Frank The Tank March 24, 2015 at 9:44am
    Hahahaha
    'Concerning Act' puhlease.
    This NRL review committee is becoming a joke.
    • macybrown > Frank The Tank March 24, 2015 at 10:04am

      Yeah I know Frank.

      I used to think they were a joke too, but with each passing year I am now beginning to think that they are more biased and discriminatory actually.

      I am not hahaing at them anymore :(

  • josh jones March 24, 2015 at 10:45am
    Like old mate Rothfield said NRL is run by a bunch ameaturs. They fix 1 thing only to let 5 others things slide. It took the the previous management 10yrs to decide the corner post should be in play. They have trialed captains challenge for 3yrs now in lower grades. I bumped into todd greenberg the other day n asked him whats the deal with the refs n video refs. He replied "mate I'm confused as well". Gaaaaaawn.
  • Hugo March 24, 2015 at 11:00am
    I am so very sick of this crap !!!!
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Mark O'neill out - Shane Richardson in
"The consequences of that is does Shane Richardson want to be the head of football. If he does then that question becomes relevant! The best person becomes only relevant when considering who is available......or who you would ask to be available.
The…"
6 minutes ago
LB replied to LB's discussion 1eE Modern day Eels team: Second-row
"I though Ma'u and McCracken would be the favorites "
6 minutes ago
Nitram replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kemp: Eels vs Storm R1 refereeing was "really, really bad...disgraceful"
"Obviously the ref either;
A) failured and cant do his job, or
B) was asked to apply the blow torch (hahah no chance, go back to A).
BUT, I watched the manly/canberra game and the ref was killing the raiders as well (at the start). The difference was…"
10 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Mark O'neill out - Shane Richardson in
"Yes he is an executive director. Not elected from the board, he could be replaced at any time, i.e not an elected director."
11 minutes ago
More…

Eels blogs

Social Blogs