You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"The NRL are involved because Melbourne got them involved with threats of penalities if Parra didnt comply"
"In return for lomax we should ask for the storm to buy all our Top 30 a boat. The boys can then rip up Parra River with donuts"
"We should. He'll be out of puff and sorts. Target him all game long."
"Lomax isnt on our cap, hes was released and cap space freed. his breaking the condition of his release, we should not be settling for a mid level player unless its multiple players.
if we were smart he would not be playing rd1 against us either. "
if we were smart he would not be playing rd1 against us either. "
Replies
And the cowboy prop will get a slap on the wrist, you watch!
Why wouldn't he be cleared? I mean Graham was pardoned of a blatant shoulder charge, even Graham himself knew it was one, but apparently MRC didn't. Oh that's right, Ma'u doesn't play for Dogs, and will get 10 weeks suspension whereas Cows player charged for same offence will be cleared. Come on down Greenberg!
Honestly not just saying this because I'm a parra fan but honestly there was nothing it in.
i'd have edwards in, watmough to the bench if available, if not Gower as he can play both lock and edge like edwards.
Regardless i doubt he'd be charged, there was nothing in it on either sides 'crusher', yet the commentators were repeatedly coming to scott's defence, yet said nothing on mau's even though they were identical tackles.
Agree brissyeel but Ma'u cited last year for lifting knee, I didn't think anything of it, but I think he sat out 2 weeks. Depends which team you play for apparently and I know it shouldn't be.